McIntyre, et al v. Golubski, et al
| UNIFIED GOVERNMENT OF WYANDOTTE COUNTY AND KANSAS CITY, KANSAS, DENNIS WARE, Detective, JAMES L. BROWN, officer, W.K. SMITH, Detective, JOHN DOES 1-10, Officers, ROGER ROE 1-10, Supervisors and DAPHNE R. HALDERMAN, as Special Administrator of the estates of James Michael Krstolich, Dennis Otto Barber, and Steve Culp |
| LAMONTE MCINTYRE and ROSE LEE MCINTYRE |
| ROGER GOLUBSKI, Detective |
| 22-3115 |
| June 22, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| [10923393] Entry of appearance submitted by Emma Freudenberger and Anna Benvenutti Hoffmann for Appellees Lamonte McIntyre and Rose Lee McIntyre for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: No. Served on 06/30/2022. Manner of Service: email. [22-3115] --[Edited 06/30/2022 by SLS to remove PDF from docket entry as the document has been filed.] EF [Entered: 06/30/2022 11:23 AM] |
| [10923400] Entry of appearance filed by Anna Benvenutti Hoffmann and Emma Freudenberger for Lamonte McIntyre and Rose Lee McIntyre. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 06/30/2022. Manner of Service: email. [22-3115] [Entered: 06/30/2022 11:32 AM] |
| [10921530] Civil case docketed. Preliminary record filed. DATE RECEIVED: 06/21/2022 Docketing statement due 07/06/2022 for Roger Golubski. Transcript order form due 07/06/2022 for Roger Golubski. Notice of appearance due on 07/06/2022 for Roger Golubski, Lamonte McIntyre and Rose Lee McIntyre. [22-3115] [Entered: 06/22/2022 12:22 PM] |
| [10921586] Notice of an NDA re-sent to Grace Ann Paras. [22-3115] [Entered: 06/22/2022 02:45 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
