Yarbrough v. Langford
| DAVID A. YARBROUGH |
| DON LANGFORD, Warden, Ellsworth Correctional Facility |
| 22-3116 |
| June 23, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| [10921844] Prisoner case docketed. DATE RECEIVED: 06/23/2022. Fee or ifp forms due 07/25/2022 for David A. Yarbrough. Notice of appearance due on 07/07/2022 for Don Langford, and on 07/25/2022 for David A. Yarbrough.. [22-3116] [Entered: 06/23/2022 02:44 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Yarbrough v. Langford | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: DAVID A. YARBROUGH | |
| Represented By: | David A. Yarbrough |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: DON LANGFORD, Warden, Ellsworth Correctional Facility | |
| Represented By: | Kristafer R. Ailslieger |
| Represented By: | Natalie Chalmers |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
