In re: Young
| In re: DONALD C. YOUNG |
| DAVID R. MCKUNE, Warden, Lansing Correctional Facility, ROGER WERHOLTZ, Secretary of Corrections and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF KANSAS |
| 22-3124 |
| July 6, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| [10924813] Entry of appearance filed by Kristafer R. Ailslieger for Roger Werholtz, Attorney General of Kansas and David R. McKune. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 07/07/2022. Manner of Service: US mail. [22-3124] [Entered: 07/07/2022 09:59 AM] |
| [10924806] Appellee's notice that a response brief will not be filed by Attorney General of Kansas, David R. McKune and Mr. Roger Werholtz. Served on 07/07/2022. Manner of Service: US mail. [22-3124] KRA [Entered: 07/07/2022 09:46 AM] |
| [10924805] Entry of appearance submitted by Kristafer R. Ailslieger for Respondents Attorney General of Kansas, David R. McKune and Mr. Roger Werholtz for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: No. Served on 07/07/2022. Manner of Service: US mail. [22-3124] --[Edited 07/07/2022 by SLS to remove PDF from docket entry as the document has been filed.] KRA [Entered: 07/07/2022 09:45 AM] |
| [10924515] Application to proceed without prepayment of fees and affidavit (on district court form) received from Donald C. Young but not filed. Served on 07/06/2022. Manner of Service: email. [22-3124] [Entered: 07/06/2022 12:51 PM] |
| [10924509] Case docketed. Petition for permission to file successive 2254 habeas petition in district court. DATE RECEIVED: 07/05/2022. [22-3124] [Entered: 07/06/2022 12:44 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
