Sullivan v. WorkMarket, et al
SCOTT B. SULLIVAN |
WORKMARKET and PETER CANNONE |
22-3193 |
September 30, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
Other Contract Actions |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
[10957833] Amended notice of appeal filed. [22-3193] [Entered: 11/28/2022 12:06 PM] |
[10954561] Consent to electronic service filed by filed by Scott B. Sullivan. Served on 11/10/2022. Manner of Service: email. [22-3193] [Entered: 11/10/2022 01:09 PM] |
[10954563] Appellant's motion filed by Scott B. Sullivan for permission to file electronically. Served on 11/10/2022. Manner of Service: email. [22-3193] [Entered: 11/10/2022 01:09 PM] |
[10954595] Order filed by Clerk of the Court granting appellant's motion for permission to file electronically. See order for additional information. Served on 11/10/2022. [22-3193] [Entered: 11/10/2022 01:44 PM] |
[10950639] Record on appeal filed. No. of Volumes: 2, Comments: Vol I - Pleadings; Vol II - Sealed Exhibits. [22-3193] [Entered: 10/27/2022 08:42 AM] |
[10950481] Order filed by Clerk of the Court. The abatement of this appeal is lifted. Served on 10/26/2022. [22-3193] [Entered: 10/26/2022 02:06 PM] |
[10950528] Jurisdictional review complete. Appellant's brief is due 12/5/22 for Scott B. Sullivan. Record on appeal 10th circuit due 11/16/2022. [22-3193] [Entered: 10/26/2022 03:22 PM] |
[10950277] Supplemental preliminary record filed. Contents: Text only entry. Order overrulling plaintiff's motion for relief under rule 59(E). [22-3193] [Entered: 10/25/2022 05:05 PM] |
[10947336] Attorney Mr. John Francis Doyle for WorkMarket and Peter Cannone admitted to the bar of this court. [22-3193] [Entered: 10/12/2022 04:18 PM] |
[10946305] Order filed by Clerk of the Court denying the motion for permission to file electronically filed by Appellant Scott B. Sullivan without prejudice to renewal once the abatement is lifted. Served on 10/07/2022. [22-3193] [Entered: 10/07/2022 10:19 AM] |
[10946127] Appellant's motion filed by Scott B. Sullivan for permission to file electronically. Served on 10/06/2022. Manner of Service: email. [22-3193] [Entered: 10/06/2022 03:51 PM] |
[10946115] Entry of appearance filed by Scott B. Sullivan. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: y, more than 50 parties. Served on 10/06/2022. Manner of Service: email [22-3193] [Entered: 10/06/2022 03:44 PM] |
[10945657] Admissions letter sent. Response date set to 11/04/2022 for John F. Doyle. [22-3193] [Entered: 10/05/2022 09:34 AM] |
[10944956] Entry of appearance submitted by R. Evan Jarrold and John F. Doyle for Appellees Peter Cannone and WorkMarket for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: No. Served on 10/03/2022. Manner of Service: US mail. [22-3193]--[Edited 10/03/2022 by KLP to delete the attachment; entry filed.] REJ [Entered: 10/03/2022 01:47 PM] |
[10945129] Entry of appearance filed by Mr. John F. Doyle and Mr. R. Evan Jarrold for WorkMarket and Peter Cannone. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 10/03/2022. Manner of Service: US mail. [22-3193] [Entered: 10/03/2022 04:15 PM] |
[10944583] Order filed by Clerk of the Court abating appeal pending the disposition of the post-judgment motion filed in district court. When the dispositive order is entered by the district court, the clerk of the district court is directed to supplement the preliminary record. Served on 09/30/2022. [22-3193] [Entered: 09/30/2022 01:47 PM] |
[10944503] Civil case docketed. Preliminary record filed. DATE RECEIVED: 09/30/2022 Notice of appearance due on 10/14/2022 for Peter Cannone and WorkMarket, and Notice of appearance due on 10/31/2022 for Scott B. Sullivan. [22-3193] [Entered: 09/30/2022 10:25 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.