Gorbey v. Doe, et al
| MICHAEL STEVEN GORBEY |
| JOHN OR JANE DOE, Regional Director, FBOP North Central Regional Office and JOHN OR JANE DOE, Remedy Clerk, FBOP North Central Regional Office |
| 22-3201 |
| October 18, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| [10960883] Appellant's consolidated brief filed by Michael Steven Gorbey. Original. Clerk made 4 copies. Served on 11/28/2022 by US Mail. Required 10th Cir. R. 28.2 Attachments Included? n. [22-3194, 22-3201]--[Edited 12/12/2022 by DJD to note treated as a supplement to the opening brief in 22-3175] [Entered: 12/09/2022 11:47 AM] |
| [10960066] Order filed by Clerk of the Court to correct clerical error in 2nd paragraph of 12/02/2022 order. Appellant's motion to cure clerical mistakes is granted in part. Upon receiving Appellant's opening brief, the Clerk will docket the opening brief as a consolidated opening brief in Nos. 22-3194 and 22-3201 and set the appeals at issue. Any other relief requested is denied. Served on 12/06/2022. [22-3175, 22-3194, 22-3201] [Entered: 12/06/2022 03:34 PM] |
| [10959366] Appellant's "Motion Rule 36 to cure clerical mistakes" filed by Michael Steven Gorbey. Served on 12/02/2022. Manner of Service: email. Note: motion added to include consolidated appeals [22-3194, 22-3201] [Entered: 12/02/2022 01:54 PM] |
| [10959369] Appellant's "Objections to PLRA matters" (construed as a motion for reconsideration; see 12/02/22 order) filed by Michael Steven Gorbey. Served on 12/02/2022. Manner of Service: email. Note: motion added to include consolidated appeals --[Edited 12/02/2022 by MLB to edit docket text][22-3194, 22-3201] [Entered: 12/02/2022 01:55 PM] |
[10959429] Order filed by Judges Matheson and Bacharach denying appellant's motion for reconsideration filed by Michael Steven Gorbey. Served on 12/02/2022. [22-3175, 22-3194, 22-3201] [Entered: 12/02/2022 03:30 PM]
|
| [10959430] Order filed by Clerk of the Court granting in part appellant's motion to cure clerical mistakes. Upon receiving Appellants opening brief, the Clerk will docket the opening brief as a consolidated opening brief in Appeal Nos. 22-3195 and 22-3201 and set the appeals at issue. Any other relief requested is denied. Served on 12/02/2022. [22-3175, 22-3194, 22-3201] [Entered: 12/02/2022 03:33 PM] |
| [10955909] Order filed by Clerk of the Court. Upon careful consideration, these appeals are consolidated 22-3175, 22-3194 & 22-3201. See order for additional information and instructions. Appellant's consolidated opening brief due on 12/27/2022 for Michael Steven Gorbey, in appeal nos. 22-3194 and 22-3201. Fee or 1915 forms due 12/27/2022 in appeal no. 22-3194 for Michael Steven Gorbey. Served on 01/16/2022. [22-3194, 22-3175, 22-3201] [Entered: 11/16/2022 01:35 PM] |
| [10955588] Order filed by Clerk of the Court denying appellant's motion for administrative order as unnecessary filed by Michael Steven Gorbey. See order for additional information. Served on 11/15/2022. [22-3201] [Entered: 11/15/2022 02:34 PM] |
| [10955594] Order filed by Clerk of the Court assessing costs and fees in the amount of $505. Served on 11/15/2022. [22-3201] [Entered: 11/15/2022 02:43 PM] |
| [10955586] Appellant's motion filed by Michael Steven Gorbey for leave to proceed without prepayment of costs and fees. Supplement to IFP motion included from 22-3175 per the court's 11/15/22 order. Served on 11/15/2022. Manner of Service: email. [22-3201] [Entered: 11/15/2022 02:33 PM] |
| [10955582] Appellant's Motion for Administrative Order to Enforce FBOP Obligations Regarding the PLRA filed by Michael Steven Gorbey. Served on 11/15/2022. Manner of Service: email. [22-3201] [Entered: 11/15/2022 02:29 PM] |
| [10955438] Reqest for forms letter received from Michael Steven Gorbey but not filed. Brief form sent on 11/15/22. Served on 11/15/2022. Manner of Service: email. [22-3201] [Entered: 11/15/2022 12:13 PM] |
| [10953606] Record on appeal filed. No. of Volumes: 2. Volume I - Pleadings and Volume II - Sealed Pleadings. [22-3201] [Entered: 11/08/2022 10:26 AM] |
| [10952468] Jurisdictional review complete. Record on appeal 10th circuit due 11/25/2022. Appellant's brief due on 12/13/2022 for Michael Steven Gorbey. [22-3201] [Entered: 11/03/2022 10:20 AM] |
|
[10952463] Order filed by Judges Matheson and Bacharach referring the 28 U.S.C. 1915(g) issue to the panel of judges that will be assigned later to consider the merits of this appeal; directing appellant to file a 1915 form within 40 days (12/13/2022) of the date of this order. Served on 11/03/2022. (See the attachment for the order.) [22-3201] [Entered: 11/03/2022 10:16 AM]
|
| [10951358] Response filed by Michael Steven Gorbey to order to show cause. [22-3201] [Entered: 10/31/2022 01:06 PM] |
| [10951352] Entry of appearance filed by Michael Steven Gorbey. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: y. [22-3201] [Entered: 10/31/2022 12:58 PM] |
| [10948533] District court order denying 1915(b) motion. [22-3201] [Entered: 10/18/2022 12:10 PM] |
| [10948648] Order filed by Clerk of the Court directing appellant to show cause why he should not be required to prepay the entire filing fee as required by 28 U.S.C. 1915(g) within 21 days. (Response due on 11/08/2022 for Michael Steven Gorbey.) Please see attached order for additional information. Served on 10/18/2022. [22-3201] [Entered: 10/18/2022 04:37 PM] |
| [10948528] Prisoner case docketed. DATE RECEIVED: 10/17/2022. Notice of appearance due on 11/17/2022 for Michael Steven Gorbey. [22-3201] [Entered: 10/18/2022 12:05 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
