Rudometkin v. Johnston, et al
DAVID J. RUDOMETKIN |
MICHAEL JOHNSTON and CHRISTINE WORMUTH |
22-3250 |
November 8, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
[10958928] Record on appeal filed. No. of Volumes: 1, Comments: vol 1 pleadings. [22-3250] [Entered: 12/01/2022 10:30 AM] |
[10957009] Jurisdictional review complete. Appellant's brief due on 01/03/2023 for David J. Rudometkin. Notice of appearance due on 01/03/2023 for David J. Rudometkin. Record on appeal 10th circuit due 12/12/2022 [22-3250] [Entered: 11/21/2022 04:13 PM] |
[10957001] Fee paid. Date paid in District Court on 11/21/2022. [22-3250] [Entered: 11/21/2022 04:01 PM] |
[10953614] Entry of appearance filed by Jared S. Maag for Christine Wormuth and Michael Johnston. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 11/08/2022. Manner of Service: US mail [22-3250] [Entered: 11/08/2022 10:47 AM] |
[10953607] Entry of appearance submitted by Jared S. Maag for Appellees Christine Wormuth and Michael Johnston for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: No. Served on 11/08/2022. Manner of Service: US mail. [22-3250]--[Edited 11/08/2022 by DJD. Removed PDF as pleading filed 11/8/22] JSM [Entered: 11/08/2022 10:31 AM] |
[10953585] Prisoner case docketed. DATE RECEIVED: 11/07/2022. Fee or ifp forms due 12/08/2022 for David J. Rudometkin. Notice of appearance due on 11/22/2022 for Michael Johnston and Christine Wormuth, and Notice of appearance due on 12/08/2022 for David J. Rudometkin. [22-3250] [Entered: 11/08/2022 09:56 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.