City of Salina v. Gilbert
| CITY OF SALINA |
| CRAIG IVAN GILBERT |
| 22-3255 |
| November 18, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| [10957617] Jurisdictional Defect. (LAL) Procedural termination after other judicial action. Written, unsigned, unpublished; Judges McHugh, Briscoe and Rossman. [22-3255, 22-3256, 22-3257] [Entered: 11/23/2022 02:55 PM] |
| [10956469] Prisoner case docketed. DATE RECEIVED: 11/18/2022. Notice of appearance and fee or 1915 forms due 12/19/2022 for Craig Ivan Gilbert. [22-3255] [Entered: 11/18/2022 10:17 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: City of Salina v. Gilbert | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: CITY OF SALINA | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: CRAIG IVAN GILBERT | |
| Represented By: | Craig Ivan Gilbert |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
