Kerkhoff v. West Valley City District Court, et al
| KEVIN LEE KERKHOFF |
| WEST VALLEY CITY DISTRICT COURT, ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE, CORY R. WALL, THADEUS WENT, BRETT BOLTON and KEVIN BISHOP |
| 22-4002 |
| January 26, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| [10888948] Jurisdictional Defect; Procedural termination after other judicial action; Written, unsigned, unpublished; Judges Hartz, Holmes and Bacharach. [22-4002] [Entered: 01/27/2022 03:37 PM] |
| [10888905] Entry of appearance filed by Mr. J. Clifford Petersen for Attorney General's Office. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 01/27/2022. Manner of Service: US mail. [22-4002] [Entered: 01/27/2022 02:05 PM] |
| [10888883] Entry of appearance submitted by J. Clifford Petersen for Appellees Attorney General's Office and West Valley City District Court for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: No. Served on 01/27/2022. Manner of Service: email, US mail. [22-4002]--[Edited 01/27/2022 by JM PDF removed filed 1/27/22.] JCP [Entered: 01/27/2022 01:08 PM] |
| [10888567] Notice of an NDA re-sent to Brett Boulton. [22-4002] [Entered: 01/26/2022 02:28 PM] |
| [10888526] Civil case docketed. Preliminary record filed. DATE RECEIVED: 01/26/2022 Notice of appearance due on 02/09/2022 for Attorney General's Office, Brett Bolton, Cory R. Wall, Thadeus Went and West Valley City District Court and on 02/25/2022 for Kevin Lee Kerkhoff. [22-4002] [Entered: 01/26/2022 12:58 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
