Cole v. Farris
BENJAMIN COLE |
JIM FARRIS, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary |
22-5093 |
October 19, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
Habeas Corpus - Death Penalty |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
[10954165] Order filed by Judges Tymkovich, Murphy and Moritz directing the Clerk to replace the court's 10/20/2022 order denying COA with a published order. Served on 11/09/2022. [22-5093] [Entered: 11/09/2022 11:55 AM] |
[10949029] Text only entry per the court's final order. [22-5093] [Entered: 10/20/2022 06:23 AM] |
[10949030] COA Denial;Terminated on the merits after submissions without oral hearing;Written, unsigned, unpublished;. Judges Tymkovich, Murphy and Moritz. Mr. Cole's request for COA is denied, the appeal is Dismissed, the Motion for Stay of Execution is Denied as Moot.[22-5093] [Entered: 10/20/2022 06:33 AM] |
[10954171] COA Denial;Terminated on the merits after submissions without oral hearing;Written, unsigned, published;. Judges Tymkovich, Murphy and Moritz. Entry created per court order of 11/09/2022. [22-5093] [Entered: 11/09/2022 12:02 PM] |
[10954180] Judgment for opinion filed. [22-5093] [Entered: 11/09/2022 12:14 PM] |
[10949025] Response filed by Mr. Jim Farris to Appellant's Emergency Motion for Stay of Execution. Served on 10/19/2022. Manner of Service: email. This pleading complies with all required privacy and virus certifications: Yes. [22-5093] TLH [Entered: 10/19/2022 10:19 PM] |
[10949021] Appellant's appendix filed by Benjamin Cole. Total number of volumes filed: 1. Served on 10/19/2022. Manner of Service: email. This pleading complies with all required privacy and virus certifications: Yes. [22-5093] TDH [Entered: 10/19/2022 08:09 PM] |
[10949018] Motion filed by Appellant Benjamin Cole for stay of 10-20-22 Execution at 10:00 a.m.. Served on: 10/19/2021. Manner of service: email. This pleading complies with all required privacy and virus certifications: Yes. [22-5093] TDH [Entered: 10/19/2022 07:41 PM] |
[10949012] Entry of appearance submitted by Jennifer L. Crabb for Appellee Mr. Jim Farris for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: No. Served on 10/19/2022. Manner of Service: email.--[Edited 10/19/2022 by PSJ to remove PDF - document has been filed in a subsequent entry] [22-5093] JLC [Entered: 10/19/2022 05:43 PM] |
[10949011] Entry of appearance submitted by Tessa L. Henry for Appellee Mr. Jim Farris for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: No. Served on 10/19/2022. Manner of Service: email.--[Edited 10/19/2022 by PSJ to remove PDF - document has been filed in a subsequent entry] [22-5093] TLH [Entered: 10/19/2022 05:42 PM] |
[10949014] Entry of appearance filed by Tessa L. Henry for Mr. Jim Farris. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 10/19/2022. Manner of Service: email [22-5093] [Entered: 10/19/2022 06:09 PM] |
[10949015] Entry of appearance filed by Ms. Jennifer L. Crabb for Mr. Jim Farris. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 10/19/2022. Manner of Service: email [22-5093] [Entered: 10/19/2022 06:13 PM] |
[10949017] Motion filed by Appellant Benjamin Cole for issuance of certificate of appealability.. Served on: 10/19/2022. Manner of service: email. This pleading complies with all required privacy and virus certifications: Yes. [22-5093] TDH [Entered: 10/19/2022 07:35 PM] |
[10949003] Prisoner case docketed. DATE RECEIVED: 10/19/2022. Docketing statement, transcript order form, designation of record, appointment motion, and notice of appearance due 11/02/2022 by Benjamin Cole. Notice of appearance due on 11/02/2022 for Jim Farris. [22-5093] [Entered: 10/19/2022 05:23 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.