Smith v. McDonough, et al
| ERIC SMITH |
| DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs and DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS |
| 22-6131 |
| July 26, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Civil Rights Employment |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| [10935226] Filed notice record is complete. Served on 08/22/2022. Appellant's brief and appendix due on 10/03/2022 for Eric Smith. [22-6131] [Entered: 08/22/2022 12:26 PM] |
| [10934548] Notice sent to Clerk of District Court that ROA completion notice has not been received. Notice due that record is complete by 08/29/2022 for Carmelita Reeder Shinn [22-6131] [Entered: 08/18/2022 09:40 AM] |
| [10932462] Notice of Mediation Conference filed by the Tenth Circuit Mediation Office. Telephone conference scheduled for 08/23/2022 at 10:00 am (MT). The mediation contact form must be completed and returned to the Mediation Office within four days of the date of this notice. [Please open the Notice for important information.] [22-6131] [Entered: 08/09/2022 10:57 AM] |
| [10932139] Entry of appearance filed by Daniel J. Gamino for Eric Smith. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 08/08/2022. Manner of Service: email. [22-6131] [Entered: 08/08/2022 11:07 AM] |
| [10932179] Notice received from Eric Smith that a transcript is not necessary for this appeal. Served on: 08/08/2022. Manner of Service: email [22-6131] DJG [Entered: 08/08/2022 12:24 PM] |
| [10932211] Minute order filed - Notice due that record is complete by 08/15/2022 for Carmelita Reeder Shinn. (Text Only - No Attachment) [22-6131] [Entered: 08/08/2022 01:35 PM] |
| [10932128] Entry of appearance submitted by Daniel J. Gamino for Appellant Eric Smith for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: No. Served on 08/08/2022. Manner of Service: email. [22-6131] --[Edited 08/08/2022 by SLS to remove PDF from docket entry as the document has been filed.] DJG [Entered: 08/08/2022 10:41 AM] |
| [10932087] Docketing statement filed by Eric Smith. Served on 08/08/2022. Manner of Service: email. [22-6131] DJG [Entered: 08/08/2022 09:02 AM] |
| This entry has been removed from the docket. [KLP] Counsel refiled with correct case number. [10932077] Docketing statement filed by Eric Smith. Served on 08/08/2022. Manner of Service: email. [22-6131] DJG [Entered: 08/08/2022 08:46 AM] |
| This entry has been removed from the docket. [KLP] Clerk's error. Counsel directed to refile.[10932072] Entry of appearance submitted by Daniel J. Gamino for Appellant Eric Smith for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: No. Served on 08/08/2022. Manner of Service: email. [22-6131] DJG [Entered: 08/08/2022 08:45 AM] |
| [10930114] Entry of appearance submitted by Cara Rodriguez for Appellee Denis McDonough for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: No. Served on 07/28/2022. Manner of Service: email. [22-6131]--[Edited 07/28/2022 by JM PDF removed filed 7/28/22.] CNR [Entered: 07/28/2022 03:42 PM] |
| [10930130] Entry of appearance filed by Ms. Cara Nicole Rodriguez for DOVA and Denis McDonough. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 07/28/2022. Manner of Service: email [22-6131] [Entered: 07/28/2022 04:58 PM] |
| [10929705] Notice of an NDA re-sent to Cara Rodriguez. [22-6131] [Entered: 07/27/2022 10:44 AM] |
| [10929421] Civil case docketed. Preliminary record filed. DATE RECEIVED: 07/26/2022 Docketing statement, transcript order form and notice of appearance due 08/09/2022 for Eric Smith. Notice of appearance due on 08/09/2022 for Department of Veterans Affairs and Denis McDonough [22-6131] [Entered: 07/26/2022 11:58 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
