Bird, et al v. Martinez-Ellis, et al
CHESTER L. BIRD, RYAN A. BROWN and RICHARD B. DAUGE |
MELANIE MARTINEZ-ELLIS, RN, Health Services Administrator and MICHAEL PACHECO, Warden, Wyoming Medium Correctional Institution, in their individual capacities |
22-8012 |
March 23, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Bird, et al. v. Martinez-Ellis, et al. |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
[10912148] Appellants brief filed by Mr. Chester L. Bird, Ryan A. Brown and Richard B. Dauge. Original and 4 copies. Served on 05/10/2022 by email.. Required 10th Cir. R. 28.2 Attachments Included? n. Appellees brief due 06/09/2022 for Melanie Martinez-Ellis and Michael Pacheco [22-8012] [Entered: 05/10/2022 09:51 AM] |
[10912149] Appellants' motion filed by Mr. Chester L. Bird, Ryan A. Brown and Richard B. Dauge for judicial notice. Served on 05/10/2022. Manner of Service: email. [22-8012] [Entered: 05/10/2022 09:54 AM] |
[10912160] Order filed by Clerk of the Court referring Appellants' motion for judicial notice [ # 10912149-2 ] to the panel of judges that will later be assigned to consider this case on the merits (no ruling will issue at this time). Served on 05/10/2022. [22-8012] [Entered: 05/10/2022 10:42 AM] |
[10908128] Record on appeal filed. No. of Volumes: 4, Comments: Vols 1-4 pleadings. [22-8012] [Entered: 04/22/2022 09:01 AM] |
[10907497] Jurisdictional review complete. Appellants' single combined brief due on 05/31/2022 for Chester L. Bird, Ryan A. Brown and Richard B. Dauge. Fee or 1915 forms due 05/31/2022 for Chester L. Bird, Ryan A. Brown and Richard B. Dauge. Record on appeal 10th circuit due 05/11/2022 [22-8012] [Entered: 04/20/2022 08:42 AM] |
[10904602] Entry of appearance filed by Ms. Erica Rachel Day and Mr. Scott E. Ortiz for Michael Pacheco and Melanie Martinez-Ellis. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: y. Served on 04/06/2022. Manner of Service: US mail [22-8012] [Entered: 04/06/2022 10:21 AM] |
[10904593] Entry of appearance submitted by Scott E. Ortiz and Erica R. Day for Appellees Melanie Martinez-Ellis and Mr. Michael Pacheco for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: Yes. Served on 04/06/2022. Manner of Service: US mail. --[Edited 04/06/2022 by JJH] to remove pdf as pleading filed 04/06/2022 [22-8012] ERD [Entered: 04/06/2022 09:58 AM] |
[10903710] Order filed by Clerk of the Court denying as unnecessary motion for protective order filed by Appellants Mr. Chester L. Bird, Ryan A. Brown and Richard B. Dauge. Served on 04/01/2022. [22-8012] [Entered: 04/01/2022 03:40 PM] |
[10903709] Appellants' motion for protective order filed by Mr. Chester L. Bird, Ryan A. Brown and Richard B. Dauge. Served on 04/01/2022. Manner of Service: email. [22-8012] [Entered: 04/01/2022 03:37 PM] |
[10901873] Consent to electronic service filed by filed by Mr. Chester L. Bird, Ryan A. Brown, and Richard B. Dauge. Served on 03/25/2022. Manner of Service: email. [22-8012] [Entered: 03/25/2022 12:42 PM] |
[10901882] Entry of appearance filed by Mr. Chester L. Bird, Ryan A. Brown, and Richard B. Dauge. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 03/25/2022. Manner of Service: email. [22-8012] [Entered: 03/25/2022 12:55 PM] |
[10901221] Prisoner case docketed. DATE RECEIVED: 03/23/2022. Notice of appearance due on 04/22/2022 for Chester L. Bird, Ryan A. Brown and Richard B. Dauge, and Notice of appearance due on 04/06/2022 for Melanie Martinez-Ellis and Michael Pacheco. Fee or ifp forms due 04/22/2022 for Chester L. Bird, Ryan A. Brown and Richard B. Dauge. [22-8012] [Entered: 03/23/2022 10:17 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.