Abarca-Quintanilla, et al v. Garland
VILMA DEL ROSARIO ABARCA-QUINTANILLA and YULISSA LISBETH ABARCA-ABRACA |
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General |
22-9510 |
February 25, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Abarca-Quintanilla, et al. v. Garland |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
[10895528] Entry of appearance filed by Mr. Richard Kelley for Merrick B. Garland. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: y (One of the parties listed is a party to the appeal). Served on 02/28/2022. Manner of Service: email. [22-9510] [Entered: 02/28/2022 08:17 AM] |
[10895498] Entry of appearance submitted by Richard J. Kelley for Respondent Merrick B. Garland for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: Yes. Served on 02/28/2022. Manner of Service: email. [22-9510] --[Edited 02/28/2022 by AT to remove PDF as pleading was filed on 2/28/2022.] RK [Entered: 02/28/2022 05:02 AM] |
[10895401] Petition for review filed. Served on 02/25/2022. Manner of Service: email. Attorneys for Respondent: DOH/EOIR/BIA, OIL, and Tyler. Copy of petition served on party at address shown in 02/25/2022 letter. Docketing statement due 03/11/2022 for Yulissa Lisbeth Abarca-Abraca and Vilma Del Rosario Abarca-Quintanilla. Agency record due 04/06/2022 for Merrick B. Garland. Fee is due by 03/11/2022 for Yulissa Lisbeth Abarca-Abraca and Vilma Del Rosario Abarca-Quintanilla. Notice of appearance due on 03/11/2022 for Yulissa Lisbeth Abarca-Abraca, Vilma Del Rosario Abarca-Quintanilla, and Merrick B. Garland. [22-9510] [Entered: 02/25/2022 02:14 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.