Caballero-Tarazona, et al v. Garland
Petitioner: NORA CABALLERO-TARAZONA and XIOMARA NIKOLE HINOJO-CABALLERO
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Case Number: 22-9565
Filed: September 29, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
May 30, 2023 Caballero-Tarazona, et al. v. Garland

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 30, 2022 [10944484] Entry of appearance filed by Ms. Lynda Do for Merrick B. Garland. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: y. Served on 09/30/2022. Manner of Service: email [22-9565] [Entered: 09/30/2022 09:31 AM]
September 30, 2022 [10944479] Entry of appearance submitted by Lynda A. Do for Respondent Merrick B. Garland for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: Yes. Served on 09/30/2022. Manner of Service: email. [22-9565] [Edited to remove PDF as pleading has been filed-- Edited 09/30/2022 by NA] LD [Entered: 09/30/2022 09:21 AM]
September 29, 2022 [10944335] Order filed by Clerk of the Court-This matter is before the court following receipt of the transferred petition for review from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. We note a temporary stay of removal is currently in place. In order to consider the appropriateness of continuing that stay, petitioners should submit a motion which meets the requirements of the local rules of this court. See order for details. Any renewed motion due on 11/01/2022 for Nora Caballero-Tarazona and Xiomara Nikole Hinojo-Caballero. Served on 09/29/2022. [22-9565] [Entered: 09/29/2022 02:30 PM]
September 29, 2022 [10944269] Transferred Petition for review filed. Served on 09/29/2022. Manner of Service: email - Attorney for Respondents: DOH/EOIR/BIA, Executive Review Unit, General Counsel, OIL. Copy of petition served on party at address shown in 09/29/2022 letter. Fee pd. Docketing statement due 10/13/2022 for Nora Caballero-Tarazona and Xiomara Nikole Hinojo-Caballero. Agency record due 11/08/2022 for Merrick B. Garland.. Notice of appearance due on 10/13/2022 for Nora Caballero-Tarazona and Xiomara Nikole Hinojo-Caballero [22-9565] [Entered: 09/29/2022 12:42 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Caballero-Tarazona, et al v. Garland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: NORA CABALLERO-TARAZONA
Represented By: John Carlos Barrera
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: XIOMARA NIKOLE HINOJO-CABALLERO
Represented By: John Carlos Barrera
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Represented By: DOH/EOIR/BIA
Represented By: Lynda Do
Represented By: Executive Review Unit
Represented By: OIL OIL
Represented By: General Counsel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?