Jordan v. United States Department of Justice, et al
| BRALEN LAMAR JORDAN |
| UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Federal Bureau of Prisons, E CONDOVER, USP, FBOP, THOMSON, AUSP, Federal Bureau of Prisons and CASE MANAGER |
| 23-1039 |
| February 7, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| [10989499] Default; Procedural termination without judicial action. [23-1039] [Entered: 04/06/2023 02:15 PM] |
| [10989502] Mandate issued. [23-1039] [Entered: 04/06/2023 02:16 PM] |
| [10984312] Deficiency notice issued. Type of deficiency: Appellant has not filed a response to this court's show cause order. Response now due on 03/27/2023 for Bralen Lamar Jordan. [23-1039] [Entered: 03/17/2023 01:19 PM] |
| [10979099] Miscellaneous correspondence received from Bralen Lamar Jordan but not filed. [23-1039] [Entered: 02/24/2023 11:12 AM] |
| [10979098] Entry of appearance filed by Bralen Lamar Jordan. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. [23-1039] [Entered: 02/24/2023 11:11 AM] |
| [10975531] Jurisdiction challenged. Response due on 03/01/2023 for Bralen Lamar Jordan. Briefing on the merits is suspended pending further order of the court. [23-1039]--[Edited 02/08/2023 by JM attach order.] [Entered: 02/08/2023 12:29 PM] |
| [10975368] Prisoner case docketed. DATE RECEIVED: 02/07/2023. Fee or ifp forms due 03/09/2023 for Bralen Lamar Jordan. Notice of appearance due on 03/09/2023 for Bralen Lamar Jordan. [23-1039] [Entered: 02/07/2023 06:21 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
