Goodge v. Montgomery, et al
| MICHAEL SHANE H.W. GOODGE |
| VALERIE MONTGOMERY, TAYLOR FITHAN, PATRICK KENNEDY, JOSEPH ROY BALL, KIP HALLMAN and JORGE DOMINICS |
| 23-1277 |
| September 7, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| [11033816] District Court minute order filed denying motion for remote appearance and for appointment of counsel without prejudice as premature and for not using correct forms. Denying as moot, motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. [23-1277] [Entered: 10/02/2023 04:39 PM] |
| [11032827] Default;Procedural termination without judicial action;Clerk of the Court. [23-1277] [Entered: 09/28/2023 01:11 PM] |
| [11032828] Mandate issued. [23-1277] [Entered: 09/28/2023 01:11 PM] |
| [11032797] Miscellaneous correspondence received from Michael Shane H.W. Goodge but not filed. [23-1277] [Entered: 09/28/2023 12:32 PM] |
| [11030074] Entry of appearance filed by Michael Shane H.W. Goodge. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. (received via email from the district court) [23-1277] [Entered: 09/19/2023 03:30 PM] |
| [11029544] Miscellaneous correspondence received from Michael Shane H.W. Goodge but not filed. [23-1277] [Entered: 09/18/2023 03:26 PM] |
| [11026625] Jurisdiction challenged. Appellant's memorandum brief due 09/21/2023 for Michael Shane H.W. Goodge [23-1277] See order for details. [Entered: 09/07/2023 12:02 PM] |
| [11026522] Prisoner case docketed. DATE RECEIVED: 09/06/2023. Notice of appearance due on 10/10/2023 for Michael Shane H.W. Goodge. [23-1277] [Entered: 09/07/2023 09:18 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
