United States v. Eshom
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| DARCIE LEE ESHOM, AKA Darcie Lee Sigmund |
| 23-1350 |
| November 2, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| [11041322] Criminal case docketed. Preliminary record filed. DATE RECEIVED: 11/02/2023. Docketing statement, A/Pet designation of record, transcript order form, appointment motion and notice of appearance due 11/16/2023 for Darcie Lee Eshom. Notice of appearance and disclosure statement due on 11/16/2023 for United States of America. [23-1350] [Entered: 11/02/2023 09:20 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: United States v. Eshom | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Tonya S. Andrews |
| Represented By: | Daniel Wilson Warhola |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: DARCIE LEE ESHOM, AKA Darcie Lee Sigmund | |
| Represented By: | Kelly D. Christl |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
