United States v. Rosas
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| RENEE ROSAS |
| 23-2085 |
| June 16, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
[11007550] Order filed by Judges Holmes granting appellant's attorney motion to withdraw as attorney, and appointing attorney Robert Spencer Jackson for Renee Rosas, in case 23-2085 to represent appellant. Notice of appearance due on 06/30/2023 for Renee Rosas. Any supplemental designation of record and transcriptorder form due 07/07/2023 for Renee Rosas. See order for detailed information. Served on 06/21/2023. [23-2085] [Entered: 06/21/2023 11:01 AM]
|
| [11006776] Motion filed by Appellant Renee Rosas for attorney Douglas E. Couleur to withdraw as counsel. Served on: 06/16/2023. Manner of service: email. This pleading complies with all required privacy and virus certifications: Yes. [23-2085] DEC [Entered: 06/16/2023 12:28 PM] |
| [11006786] Minute order filed - Transcript order form due 06/30/2023 for Ex. Reporting Services, Inc. (4/13/23 sentencing). (Text Only - No Attachment) [23-2085] [Entered: 06/16/2023 12:43 PM] |
| [11006759] Entry of appearance filed by Mr. Douglas E. Couleur for Renee Rosas. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 06/16/2023. Manner of Service: email [23-2085] [Entered: 06/16/2023 12:10 PM] |
| [11006755] Acknowledgment of transcript order filed by Renee Rosas. Transcript ordered: Sentencing hearing on April 13, 2023. Served on: 06/16/2023. Manner of Service: email. [23-2085] DEC [Entered: 06/16/2023 12:08 PM] |
| [11006753] Entry of appearance submitted by Douglas E. Couleur for Appellant Renee Rosas for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: No. Served on 06/16/2023. Manner of Service: email. [23-2085]--[Edited 06/16/2023 by LG to remove PDF from entry, as pleading was filed on 6/16/2023] DEC [Entered: 06/16/2023 12:05 PM] |
| [11006754] Docketing statement filed by Renee Rosas. Served on 06/16/2023. Manner of Service: email. [23-2085] DEC [Entered: 06/16/2023 12:06 PM] |
| [11006692] Criminal case docketed. Preliminary record filed. DATE RECEIVED: 06/16/2023. Docketing statement due 06/30/2023 for Renee Rosas. Notice of appearance due on 06/30/2023 for Renee Rosas and United States of America. Disclosure statement due on 06/30/2023 for United States of America. Appellant's designation of record due 06/30/2023 for Renee Rosas. Transcript order form due 06/30/2023 for Renee Rosas. Appointment motion due 06/30/2023 by Renee Rosas [23-2085] [Entered: 06/16/2023 09:49 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: United States v. Rosas | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Sarah J. Mease |
| Represented By: | Nicholas S. Mote |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: RENEE ROSAS | |
| Represented By: | Robert Spencer Jackson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
