United States v. Briscoe
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
DAKOTA DON BRISCOE |
23-2188 |
November 20, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
[11046779] Order filed by Judge Holmes - granting Appellees Motion to Reappoint FPD on Appeal. The Federal Public Defender for the District of New Mexico is appointed as counsel of record to represent the appellee. Served on 11/21/2023. [23-2188] [Entered: 11/21/2023 01:38 PM] |
[11046715] Motion filed by Appellee Dakota Don Briscoe to appoint attorney Violet Edelman. Served on: 11/21/2023. Manner of service: email. This pleading complies with all required privacy and virus certifications: Yes. [23-2188] VE [Entered: 11/21/2023 11:53 AM] |
[11046694] Entry of appearance filed by Ms. Violet Edelman for Dakota Don Briscoe. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 11/21/2023. Manner of Service: email [23-2188] [Entered: 11/21/2023 11:24 AM] |
[11046691] Entry of appearance submitted by Violet Edelman for Appellee Dakota Don Briscoe for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: Yes. Served on 11/21/2023. Manner of Service: email. --[Edited 11/21/2023 by JJH to remove pdf as pleading filed 11/21/2023][23-2188] VE [Entered: 11/21/2023 11:17 AM] |
[11046292] Criminal case docketed. Preliminary record filed. DATE RECEIVED:. Docketing statement, transcript order form, notice of appearance, and disclosure form due 12/04/2023 for United States of America. Appointment motion and notice of appearance due 12/04/2023 by Dakota Don Briscoe [23-2188] [Entered: 11/20/2023 12:26 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.