Davis v. United States
| ANTHONY LEROY DAVIS |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 23-3163 |
| September 22, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Prisoner Petitions-Mandamus & Oth |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| [11031884] Jurisdictional Defect. Procedural termination after other judicial action. Written, unsigned, and unpublished. Judges Bacharach, Briscoe, and McHugh. [23-3159, 23-3163] [Entered: 09/26/2023 11:09 AM] |
| [11031260] Prisoner case docketed. DATE RECEIVED: 09/22/2023. Notice of appearance due on 10/23/2023 for Anthony Leroy Davis. [23-3163] [Entered: 09/22/2023 01:20 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Davis v. United States | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: ANTHONY LEROY DAVIS | |
| Represented By: | Anthony Leroy Davis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
