Lakhumna v. Moughan, et al
| VIVEK LAKHUMNA |
| FNU MAUGHAN, DOYLE PECK and FNU YAHNE |
| 23-4048 |
| April 13, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| [10998122] Default. Procedural termination without judicial action by Clerk of the Court. [23-4048] [Entered: 05/10/2023 10:40 AM] |
| [10998123] Mandate issued. [23-4048] [Entered: 05/10/2023 10:42 AM] |
| [10992733] Entry of appearance submitted by Matthew David Church for Appellees FNU Yahne, FNU Maughan and Doyle Peck in 23-4048 for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: No. Served on 04/19/2023. Manner of Service: US mail.--[Edited 04/19/2023 by JJH to remove pdf as pleading filed 04/19/2023 and remove entry from 22-4044] [23-4048] MDC [Entered: 04/19/2023 10:50 AM] |
| [10992790] Entry of appearance filed by Matthew David Church for Doyle Peck, FNU Maughan and FNU Yahne. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 04/19/2023. Manner of Service: US mail [23-4048] [Entered: 04/19/2023 12:03 PM] |
| [10991606] Jurisdiction challenged. Appellant's memorandum brief due 04/28/2023 for Vivek Lakhumna [23-4048] [Entered: 04/14/2023 11:23 AM] |
| [10991369] Prisoner case docketed. DATE RECEIVED: 04/13/2023. Fee or 1915 forms pending in district court for Vivek Lakhumna. Notice of appearance due on 05/15/2023 for Vivek Lakhumna, and Notice of appearance due on 04/27/2023 for FNU Maughan, Doyle Peck and FNU Yahne. [23-4048] [Entered: 04/13/2023 03:26 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
