Norton v. Parsons, et al
| LONNIE NORTON |
| MICHAEL PARSONS, DANNY WHITE, F. MCNIELL and FNU ROMERO |
| 23-4055 |
| April 25, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| [11002877] Record on appeal filed. No. of Volumes: 2. Comments: Vol. I - Pleadings; Vol. II - Sealed Pleadings. [23-4055] [Entered: 05/31/2023 01:31 PM] |
| [11002587] Jurisdictional review complete. Notice of appearance, fee or 1915 forms and appellant's opening brief due on 07/10/2023 for Lonnie Norton. Record on appeal due for 10th circuit 06/20/2023. [23-4055] [Entered: 05/30/2023 04:40 PM] |
| [10994964] Entry of appearance filed by Peggy E. Stone for Danny White, Jason Romero, Michael Parsons and Forrest McNeil. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 04/27/2023. Manner of Service: US mail [23-4055] [Entered: 04/27/2023 03:23 PM] |
| [10994944] Entry of appearance submitted by Peggy E. Stone for Appellees F. McNiell, Michael Parsons, FNU Romero and Danny White for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: No. Served on 04/27/2023. Manner of Service: US mail. [23-4055]--[Edited 04/27/2023 by DJD. Removed PDF as pleading filed 4/27/23] PES [Entered: 04/27/2023 02:53 PM] |
| [10994225] Prisoner case docketed. DATE RECEIVED: 04/25/2023. Fee or 1915 due 05/25/2023 for Lonnie Norton in district court. Notice of appearance due on 05/09/2023 for F. McNiell, Michael Parsons, FNU Romero and Danny White, and Notice of appearance due on 05/25/2023 for Lonnie Norton. [23-4055] [Entered: 04/25/2023 01:30 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
