Hyde-Rhodes, et al v. Idaho Health Welfare, et al
| TED HYDE-RHODES |
| KIM HYDE-RHODES |
| IDAHO HEALTH WELFARE, ROBERT CROWLEY, Magistrate Judge, JIM MASON, Casa 7, STEPHEN THOMPSON, District Judge and STEVAN THOMPSON, District Judge |
| 23-4136 |
| October 27, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| [11051098] Record on appeal filed. No. of Volumes: 2, Comments: Volume I - Pleadings, Volume II - Sealed Pleadings. [23-4136] [Entered: 12/08/2023 05:42 PM] |
| [11048494] Jurisdictional review complete. Notice of appearance, fee or IFP form and appellant's brief due on 01/08/2024 for Kim Hyde-Rhodes. Records on appeal 10th circuit due 12/20/2023. [23-4135, 23-4136, 23-4137, 23-4138, 23-4139, 23-4140] [Entered: 11/29/2023 03:37 PM] |
| [11039996] Order filed by Clerk of the Court consolidating these six appeals for purposes of the entry of appearance, any pleadings, brief and submission to a panel. Appellant may file in this court by 11/27/2023, a single entry of appearance that lists all six appeals numbers. Fee or motion remain due in district court by 11/27/2023. Please see attached order for additional information. Served on 10/27/2023. [23-4135, 23-4136, 23-4137, 23-4138, 23-4139, 23-4140] [Entered: 10/27/2023 04:34 PM] |
| [11039732] Civil case docketed. Preliminary record filed. DATE RECEIVED: 10/27/2023 Notice of appearance and Fee or ifp forms due 11/27/2023 for Kim Hyde-Rhodes [23-4136] [Entered: 10/27/2023 11:04 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
