Fields v. City of Tulsa, Oklahoma, et al
EARNEST JOE FIELDS |
CITY OF TULSA, OKLAHOMA, LUCAS TEMPLE, Officer and CHERISH COMFORT, Officer |
23-5001 |
January 10, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Fields v. City of Tulsa, Oklahoma, et al. |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
[10974526] Filed notice record is complete. Served on 02/03/2023. Appellant's brief and appendix due on 03/15/2023 for Earnest Joe Fields.[23-5001] [Entered: 02/03/2023 01:54 PM] |
[10973905] Deficiency notice issued. Transcript order due 02/06/2023 for Earnest Joe Fields. [23-5001] [Entered: 02/02/2023 06:49 AM] |
[10973916] Notice received from Earnest Joe Fields that a transcript is not necessary for this appeal. Served on: 02/02/2023. Manner of Service: email [23-5001] DES [Entered: 02/02/2023 07:31 AM] |
[10973934] Minute order filed - Notice due that record is complete by 02/09/2023 for Mark C. McCartt, Clerk of Court (oclk). (Text Only - No Attachment) [23-5001] [Entered: 02/02/2023 07:44 AM] |
[10973089] Notice of Mediation Conference filed by the Tenth Circuit Mediation Office. Telephone conference scheduled for 02/09/2023 at 2:00 pm (MT). The mediation contact form must be completed and returned to the Mediation Office within four days of the date of this notice. [Please open the Notice for important information.] [23-5001] [Entered: 01/30/2023 01:29 PM] |
[10972962] Entry of appearance filed by Mr. Robert M. Blakemore, Mr. Bryon D. Helm, and Mr. Daniel E. Smolen for Earnest Joe Fields. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 01/30/2023. Manner of Service: email. [23-5001] [Entered: 01/30/2023 09:48 AM] |
[10972954] Docketing statement filed by Earnest Joe Fields. Served on 01/30/2023. Manner of Service: email. [23-5001] RMB [Entered: 01/30/2023 09:45 AM] |
This entry has been removed from the docket by MLB - Corrected docketing statement filed by attorney. [10972949] Docketing statement filed by Earnest Joe Fields. Served on 01/30/2023. Manner of Service: email. [23-5001] RMB [Entered: 01/30/2023 09:36 AM] |
[10972943] Entry of appearance submitted by Daniel E. Smolen, Robert M. Blakemore and Bryon D. Helm for Appellant Earnest Joe Fields for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: No. Served on 01/30/2023. Manner of Service: email. [23-5001] --[Edited 01/30/2023 by AT to remove PDF as pleading was filed on 1/30/2023.] RMB [Entered: 01/30/2023 09:34 AM] |
[10972299] Deficiency notice issued. Notice of appearance, docketing statement and transcript order form now due 01/30/2023 for Earnest Joe Fields. [23-5001] [Entered: 01/26/2023 07:47 AM] |
[10971028] Entry of appearance submitted by T. Michelle McGrew and R. Lawson Vaughn for Appellees City of Tulsa, Oklahoma, Cherish Comfort and Lucas Templenone for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: No. Served on 01/23/2023. Manner of Service: email. [23-5001] --[Edited 01/23/2023 by AT to remove PDF as pleading was filed on 1/23/2023.] TMM [Entered: 01/23/2023 09:20 AM] |
[10971048] Entry of appearance filed by Ms. Terri Michelle McGrew and Mr. R. Lawson Vaughn, III for City of Tulsa, Oklahoma, Lucas Temple, and Cherish Comfort. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 01/23/2023. Manner of Service: email. [23-5001] [Entered: 01/23/2023 09:45 AM] |
[10968114] Prisoner case docketed. DATE RECEIVED: 01/09/2023. Docketing statement, transcript order form and notice of appearance due 01/24/2023 for Earnest Joe Fields. Notice of appearance due on 01/24/2023 for City of Tulsa, Oklahoma, Cherish Comfort, and Lucas Temple [23-5001] [Entered: 01/10/2023 07:49 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.