In re: Morris
| PRENTISS MORRIS |
| STATE OF OKLAHOMA |
| 23-6004 |
| January 9, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| [10968009] Case docketed. Petition mandamus filed. c/s: n Fee or 1915 forms, notice of appearance due 02/08/2023 for Prentiss Morris. Certificate of service due 02/08/2023 for Prentiss Morris, directing that a certificate of service showing service of petition for writ be filed on or before. Notice of appearance due on 01/23/2023 for State of Oklahoma. DATE RECEIVED: 01/09/2023 [23-6004] [Entered: 01/09/2023 03:05 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: In re: Morris | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: PRENTISS MORRIS | |
| Represented By: | Prentiss Morris |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: STATE OF OKLAHOMA | |
| Represented By: | Samantha K. Oard |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
