United States v. Jacobs
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| DAVID AARON JACOBS |
| 23-6079 |
| June 8, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| [11004867] Criminal case docketed. Preliminary record filed. DATE RECEIVED: 06/08/2023. Docketing statement, transcript order form, designation of record, notice of appearance and appointment motion due 06/22/2023 for David Aaron Jacobs. Notice of appearance and disclosure statement due on 06/22/2023 for United States of America. [23-6079] [Entered: 06/08/2023 10:41 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: United States v. Jacobs | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Matthew Bryan Dillon |
| Represented By: | Mark Stoneman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: DAVID AARON JACOBS | |
| Represented By: | Kyle Wackenheim |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
