King v. Rogers
| CLAYTON ORVILLE KING |
| WARDEN DAVID ROGERS |
| 23-6142 |
| September 25, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| [11046705] Appellant's Supplement to Motion for Partial Judgment received from Mr. Clayton Orville King but not filed. Served on 11/15/2023. Manner of Service: US mail. [23-6142] [Entered: 11/21/2023 11:44 AM] |
| [11046393] Order filed by Clerk of the Court denying without prejudice appellant's motion for partial judgment. Opening brief remain due 12/05/2023 for Mr. Clayton Orville King. Served on 11/20/2023. [23-6142] [Entered: 11/20/2023 02:38 PM] |
| [11046386] Appellant's Motion for Partial Judgment filed by Mr. Clayton Orville King. Served on 11/14/2023. Manner of Service: US mail. [23-6142] [Entered: 11/20/2023 02:32 PM] |
| [11045378] Appellant's Rule 50 Motion filed by Mr. Clayton Orville King. [23-6142] [Entered: 11/16/2023 12:27 PM] |
| [11045391] Order filed by Clerk of the Court denying appellant's motion for judgment as a matter of law under Federal Rule Procedure 50. On or before 12/5/2023, appellant must file his combined opening brief and application for a certificate of appealability and either pay the $505 appellate filing fee to the district court or file - in this court - a motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Served on 11/16/2023. [23-6142] [Entered: 11/16/2023 12:58 PM] |
| [11044552] Record on appeal filed. No. of Volumes: 1, Comments: Volume I - Pleadings. [23-6142] [Entered: 11/14/2023 01:30 PM] |
| [11040319] Check in the amount of $500 from the Oklahoma DOC on behalf of Mr. Clayton Orville King received and returned. [23-6142] [Entered: 10/30/2023 01:53 PM] |
| [11039859] Check in the amount of $5 from the Oklahoma DOC on behalf of Mr. Clayton Orville King received and returned. [23-6142] [Entered: 10/27/2023 01:33 PM] |
| [11039270] Jurisdictional review complete. Appellant's Brief and Certificate of Appealability, and fee or ifp forms due 12/05/2023 for Clayton Orville King. Record on appeal 10th circuit due 11/16/2023 [23-6142]--[Edited 10/26/2023 by DJD to correct letter] [Entered: 10/26/2023 08:56 AM] |
| [11038448] Entry of appearance filed by Mr. Clayton Orville King. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. [23-6142] [Entered: 10/23/2023 12:57 PM] |
| [11035110] Miscellaneous correspondence received from Mr. Clayton Orville King but not filed. Response letter sent to appellant. [23-6142] [Entered: 10/06/2023 02:51 PM] |
| [11031487] Prisoner case docketed. DATE RECEIVED: 09/22/2023. Notice of appearance and Fee or ifp forms due on 10/25/2023 for Clayton Orville King. [23-6142] [Entered: 09/25/2023 11:08 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: King v. Rogers | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: CLAYTON ORVILLE KING | |
| Represented By: | Clayton Orville King |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: WARDEN DAVID ROGERS | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
