General Motors v. White
GENERAL MOTORS LLC |
ROY WHITE |
23-702 |
July 24, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
[11016137] Entry of appearance filed by Rachel Raphael and April N. Ross for General Motors LLC. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: y. Served on 07/25/2023. Manner of Service: email [23-702] [Entered: 07/25/2023 04:02 PM] |
[11016135] Rule 26 Disclosure Statement filed by General Motors LLC. More than 50 parties disclosed: no. Served on 07/25/2023. Manner of Service: email. [23-702] ANR [Entered: 07/25/2023 03:50 PM] |
[11016134] Entry of appearance submitted by April N. Ross; Rachel Raphael for Petitioner General Motors LLC for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: No. Served on 07/25/2023. Manner of Service: email. [23-702]--[Edited 07/25/2023 by LG to remove PDF from entry, as pleading was filed on 7/25/2023] ANR [Entered: 07/25/2023 03:48 PM] |
[11015851] Response to petition for permission to appeal filed by Mr. Roy White. Served on 07/24/2023. Manner of Service: email. [23-702] [Entered: 07/24/2023 04:52 PM] |
[11015825] Case docketed. Petition for permission to appeal under 23(f) filed. Notice of appearance due on 08/07/2023 for General Motors LLC and Roy White. Disclosure statement due on 08/07/2023 for General Motors LLC. Miscellaneous response due on 07/24/2023 for Roy White. DATE RECEIVED: 07/14/2023 [23-702]--[Edited 07/24/2023 by KLP to correct the text.]--[Edited 07/24/2023 by KLP to correct the response due date.] [Entered: 07/24/2023 04:10 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.