Centeno-Ramirez De Carrera, et al v. Garland
| SULMA YESENIA CENTENO-RAMIREZ DE CARRERA and MIA JOSE CARRERA-CENTENO |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General |
| 23-9580 |
| September 11, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| [11027538] Entry of appearance filed by Mr. Richard Kelley for Merrick B. Garland. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: y (parties previously disclosed). Served on 09/12/2023. Manner of Service: email. [23-9580] [Entered: 09/12/2023 08:16 AM] |
| [11027521] Entry of appearance submitted by Richard J. Kelley for Respondent Merrick B. Garland for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: Yes. Served on 09/12/2023. Manner of Service: US mail. [23-9580] --[Edited 09/12/2023 by SDS to remove pdf from entry as the pleading has been filed] RK [Entered: 09/12/2023 07:48 AM] |
| [11027318] Petition for review filed. Served on 09/08/2023. Manner of Service: email - Attorney for Respondents: DOH/EOIR/BIA, Executive Review Unit, Oil. Copy of petition served on party at address shown in 09/11/2023 letter. Fee pd:: Credit Card, Receipt #: B10-51383-328 , Amount: $ 500.00. Docketing statement due 09/25/2023 for Mia Jose Carrera-Centeno and Sulma Yesenia Centeno-Ramirez De Carrera. Agency record due 10/23/2023 for Merrick B. Garland.. Notice of appearance due on 09/25/2023 for Mia Jose Carrera-Centeno, Sulma Yesenia Centeno-Ramirez De Carrera and Merrick B. Garland [23-9580]--[Edited 09/12/2023 by SDS to correct filing date as the petition was received 09/08/2023] [Entered: 09/11/2023 01:16 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
