Recinos de Ramirez, et al v. Garland
| ABIGAIL NATHALY RECINOS DE RAMIREZ and GENESIS DIANA RAMIREZ-RECINOS |
| MERRICK GARLAND, Attorney General |
| 23-9602 |
| November 15, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| [11045114] Entry of appearance filed by Ms. Karen L. Melnik for Merrick Garland. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 11/15/2023. Manner of Service: email. [23-9602] [Entered: 11/15/2023 03:28 PM] |
| [11045103] Entry of appearance submitted by Karen L. Melnik for Respondent Merrick Garland for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: No. Served on 11/15/2023. Manner of Service: email. [23-9602] --[Edited 11/15/2023 by SDS to remove pdf from entry as the pleading has been filed] KLM [Entered: 11/15/2023 03:21 PM] |
| [11044794] Petition for review filed. Served on 11/15/2023. Manner of Service: email - Attorney for Respondents: DOH/EOIR/BIA, Executive Review Unit, Oil. Copy of petition served on party at address shown in 11/15/2023 letter. Fee pd. Receipt #: A10-51705-411, Amount: $ $500. Docketing statement due 11/29/2023 for Genesis Diana Ramirez-Recinos and Abigail Nathaly Recinos de Ramirez. Agency record due 12/26/2023 for Merrick Garland.. Notice of appearance due on 11/29/2023 for Merrick Garland, Genesis Diana Ramirez-Recinos and Abigail Nathaly Recinos de Ramirez [23-9602] --[Edited 11/15/2023 by SDS to correct filed date as the petition was received by the court on 11/14/2023] [Entered: 11/15/2023 08:45 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
