Stevenson v. Creese
| JOYCE STEVENSON |
| THOMAS CREESE |
| 24-2006 |
| January 12, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Other Real Property Actions |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 7, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| [11072338] Appellant brief filed by Ms. Joyce Stevenson. Original and 4 copies. Served on 03/07/2024 by US mail. Required 10th Cir. R. 28.2 Attachments Included? n. Appellee's brief due 04/08/2024 for Thomas Creese--[Edited 03/07/2024 by JJH to add page 5 to opening brief] [24-2006] [Entered: 03/07/2024 12:04 PM] |
| [11072361] Appellant's motion filed by Ms. Joyce Stevenson for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Served on 03/07/2024. Manner of Service: US mail. [24-2006] [Entered: 03/07/2024 12:26 PM] |
| [11072375] Second entry of appearance filed by Ms. Joyce Stevenson. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 03/07/2024. Manner of Service: US mail [24-2006] [Entered: 03/07/2024 12:36 PM] |
| [11064666] Entry of appearance filed by Ms. Joyce Stevenson. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 02/05/2024. Manner of Service: email [24-2006] [Entered: 02/05/2024 12:20 PM] |
| [11063081] Record on appeal filed. No. of Volumes: 1- pleadings. [24-2006] [Entered: 01/30/2024 10:14 AM] |
| [11062803] Jurisdictional review complete. Fee or ifp forms, notice of appearance and opening brief due by 03/11/2024 for Joyce Stevenson. Record on appeal 10th circuit due 02/20/2024 [24-2006] [Entered: 01/29/2024 02:10 PM] |
| [11062798] District court order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. [24-2006] [Entered: 01/29/2024 02:05 PM] |
| [11062472] Entry of appearance submitted by Ryan M. Walters for Appellee Mr. Thomas Creese for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: No. Served on 01/26/2024. Manner of Service: US mail, email.--[Edited 01/26/2024 by JJH to remove pdf as pleading filed 01/26/2024] [24-2006] RMW [Entered: 01/26/2024 02:44 PM] |
| [11062476] Entry of appearance filed by Mr. Ryan M. Walters for Mr. Thomas Creese. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 01/26/2024. Manner of Service: US mail [24-2006] [Entered: 01/26/2024 02:49 PM] |
| [11059700] Possible opening brief filed in the District Court and transmitted with the preliminary record received from Ms. Joyce Stevenson but not filed. Served on 01/10/2024. Manner of Service: email. [24-2006] [Entered: 01/17/2024 11:16 AM] |
| [11058999] Civil case docketed. Preliminary record filed. DATE RECEIVED: 01/12/2024. Notice of appearance due on 01/26/2024 for Thomas Creese and on 02/12/2024 for Joyce Stevenson. Order on pending IFP motion due 02/12/2024. [24-2006] [Entered: 01/12/2024 02:00 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Stevenson v. Creese | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: JOYCE STEVENSON | |
| Represented By: | Joyce Stevenson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: THOMAS CREESE | |
| Represented By: | Ryan M. Walters |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
