United States v. Ivory
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| JOMAR IVORY |
| 24-3053 |
| April 8, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| [11080955] Acknowledgment of transcript order filed by Jomar Ivory. Transcript ordered: revocation hearing held 3/28/2024. Served on: 04/09/2024. Manner of Service: email. [24-3053] DTH [Entered: 04/09/2024 03:48 PM] |
[11080969] Order filed by Judge Holmes granting appellant's motion to continue appointment. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3006A, the Federal Public Defender for the District of Kansas is appointed as counsel of record to represent the appellant Jomar Ivory. This appointment is effective nunc pro tunc to the date the notice of appeal was filed in this matter. Served on 04/09/2024. Text only order. [24-3053] [Entered: 04/09/2024 03:55 PM]
|
| [11080974] Minute order filed - Transcript order form due 04/23/2024 for Kim Greiner (revocation hearing 03/28/24). (Text Only - No Attachment) [24-3053] [Entered: 04/09/2024 04:05 PM] |
| [11080942] Designation of record filed by Appellant Jomar Ivory. Served on 04/09/2024. Manner of Service: email. [24-3053] DTH [Entered: 04/09/2024 03:35 PM] |
| [11080940] Docketing statement filed by Jomar Ivory. Served on 04/09/2024. Manner of Service: email. [24-3053] DTH [Entered: 04/09/2024 03:33 PM] |
| [11080913] Entry of appearance submitted by Daniel T. Hansmeier for Appellant Jomar Ivory for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: Yes. Served on 04/09/2024. Manner of Service: email. --[Edited 04/09/2024 by MLB to remove pdf from docket; entry filed on 04/09/24][24-3053] DTH [Entered: 04/09/2024 02:56 PM] |
| [11080914] Entry of appearance filed by Melody Brannon and Mr. Daniel T. Hansmeier for Jomar Ivory. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: y. Served on 04/09/2024. Manner of Service: email [24-3053] [Entered: 04/09/2024 03:00 PM] |
| [11080938] Motion filed by Appellant Jomar Ivory to continue appointment. Served on: 04/09/2024. Manner of service: email. This pleading complies with all required privacy and virus certifications: Yes. [24-3053] DTH [Entered: 04/09/2024 03:32 PM] |
| [11080261] Criminal case docketed. Preliminary record filed. DATE RECEIVED: 04/08/2024. Docketing statement, Notice of Appearance, Designation of Record, Transcript order form, and Appointment motion due 04/22/2024 for Jomar Ivory. Notice of appearance and Disclosure statement due on 04/22/2024 for United States of America. [24-3053] [Entered: 04/08/2024 10:43 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: United States v. Ivory | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | James A. Brown |
| Represented By: | Annette B. Gurney |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: JOMAR IVORY | |
| Represented By: | Melody Brannon |
| Represented By: | Daniel T. Hansmeier |
| Represented By: | Kirk C. Redmond |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
