Snyder v. Goble, et al
| RAYMOND MAX SNYDER |
| ALEX GOBLE, Individually and in his official capacity as a Justice of the Sixth Judicial District Court, of Sevier County, Utah, AMERICAN FAMILY INSURANCE, STEWART B. HARMAN, American Family Insurance's attorney, LAUARA ANN LISK, SHAWN B. MEADOR, WOODBURN & WEDGE, BRANDT DEATON, Detective, Sevier County, CASEY JEWKES, Sevier County Attorney, JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-10, JUDGE ALEX GOBLE, individually and in his official capacity as a Justice of the Sixth Judicial District Court, of Sevier County, Utah and STEWART HARMAN, American Family Insurance's attorney |
| 24-4009 |
| January 25, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| [11076524] Deficiency notice issued. Appellant's combined opening brief now due on 03/29/2024 for Raymond Max Snyder. [24-4009, 24-4010, 24-4011, 24-4013] [Entered: 03/22/2024 02:35 PM] |
| [11072797] Request to set for review and decision filed by Appellant Raymond Max Snyder in 24-4009, 24-4010, 24-4011, 24-4013. Served on 03/05/2024 by US mail and 03/08/2024 by email. [24-4009, 24-4010, 24-4011, 24-4013] [Entered: 03/08/2024 03:43 PM] |
| [11072802] Minute Order filed by Clerk. This matter is before the court on the appellants motion to Request to Set for Review and Decision. This motion appears to request permission to file electronically. The court previously granted the appellant leave to file using the courts electronic filing system in the order entered 2/5/2024. Therefore, this motion is denied as moot. If the appellant is having trouble registering or otherwise completing the requirements for electronic filing, he should contact the court by telephone for assistance. Served on 03/08/2024. Text only entry - no attachment. [24-4009, 24-4010, 24-4011, 24-4013] [Entered: 03/08/2024 03:48 PM] |
| [11072808] Order filed by Clerk of the Court referring Appellant Brief Confirming the U.S. District Court, District of Utah's Ongoing Deception, Bad Faith, and Fraud, and Motion to Allow Pleadings [ # 11072807-2 ] to the panel of judges that will later be assigned to consider this case on the merits (no ruling will issue at this time) in 24-4009. Served on 03/08/2024. Text only entry - no attachment. [24-4009, 24-4010, 24-4011, 24-4013] [Entered: 03/08/2024 04:04 PM] |
| [11072807] Appellant Brief Confirming the U.S. District Court, District of Utah's Ongoing Deception, Bad Faith, and Fraud, and Motion to Allow Pleadings filed by Raymond Max Snyder in 24-4009, 24-4010, 24-4011, 24-4013. Served on 03/05/2024 by US mail and 03/08/2024 by email. [24-4009, 24-4010, 24-4011, 24-4013] [Entered: 03/08/2024 04:00 PM] |
| [11072055] Opening Briefs received from Raymond Max Snyder in 24-4009, 24-4010, 24-4011 & 24-4013 but not filed. Served on 03/06/2024. Manner of Service: email. [24-4009, 24-4010, 24-4011, 24-4013] [Entered: 03/06/2024 03:07 PM] |
| [11072058] Order filed by Clerk of the Court. The court received two opening briefs from the appellant, one for Case Nos. 24-4009, 24-4010 and 24-4011 and a separate one for Case No. 24-4013. Our February 5, 2024 order expressly directed the appellant to file one opening brief applicable to all four appeals: "On or before March 18, 2024, the appellant shall file one consolidated opening brief that addresses all issues and arguments he wishes to raise about the matters being appealed in all four cases." Accordingly, the court will not file the separate briefs at this time. On or before March 15, 2024, the appellant shall file one consolidated opening brief applicable to all four appeals. Alternatively, the appellant may file a motion seeking leave to file two separate briefs explaining why the court should accept them for filing when both briefs are nearly the maximum length allowed under our rules and appear to contain substantial overlap. Served on 03/06/2024. Text only entry - no attachment. [24-4009, 24-4010, 24-4011, 24-4013] [Entered: 03/06/2024 03:09 PM] |
| [11066118] Rule 26 Disclosure Statement filed by American Family Insurance. More than 50 parties disclosed: no. Served on 02/09/2024. Manner of Service: email. [24-4009] SH [Entered: 02/09/2024 11:25 AM] |
| [11066099] Deficiency notice issued. Disclosure statement now due on 02/12/2024 for American Family Insurance. [24-4009] [Entered: 02/09/2024 10:29 AM] |
| [11065816] Entry of appearance filed by Raymond Max Snyder. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 02/06/2024. Manner of Service: US mail and Email on 2/8/2024. [24-4009] [Entered: 02/08/2024 11:29 AM] |
| [11065856] Entry of appearance submitted by Mitchell A. Stephens and Jordan Pate for Appellees Woodburn & Wedge and Shawn B. Meador for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: No. Served on 02/08/2023. Manner of Service: email. [24-4009]--[Edited 02/08/2024 by DJD. Removed PDF as pleading filed 2/8/24] MAS [Entered: 02/08/2024 12:07 PM] |
| [11065861] Entry of appearance filed by Jordan M. Pate and Mitchell A. Stephens for Shawn B. Meador and Woodburn & Wedge. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 02/08/2024. Manner of Service: email [24-4009] [Entered: 02/08/2024 12:16 PM] |
| [11065727] Entry of appearance filed by Stewart Harman for American Family Insurance and Stewart Harman. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 02/08/2024. Manner of Service: email [24-4009] [Entered: 02/08/2024 09:18 AM] |
| [11065716] Entry of appearance submitted by Stewart Burke Harman for Appellees American Family Insurance and Stewart Harman for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: No. Served on 02/08/2024. Manner of Service: email. [24-4009]--[Edited 02/08/2024 by DJD. Removed PDF as pleading filed 2/8/24] SH [Entered: 02/08/2024 08:58 AM] |
| [11065493] Entry of appearance submitted by Richard Blake Hamilton, Janise Kekauoha Macanas for Appellees Brandt Deaton and Casey Jewkes for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: No. Served on 02/07/2024. Manner of Service: US mail, email. --[Edited 02/07/2024 by MLB to remove pdf from docket; entry filed on 02/07/24][24-4009] RBH [Entered: 02/07/2024 01:03 PM] |
| [11065536] Entry of appearance filed by Mr. R. Blake Hamilton and Janise K. Macanas for Brandt Deaton and Casey Jewkes. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 02/07/2024. Manner of Service: email [24-4009] [Entered: 02/07/2024 02:33 PM] |
| [11064679] Consent to electronic service filed by filed by Raymond Max Snyder in 24-4009, 24-4010, 24-4011, 24-4013. Served on 02/05/2024. Manner of Service: email. [24-4009, 24-4010, 24-4011, 24-4013] [Entered: 02/05/2024 12:30 PM] |
| [11064681] Appellant's motion filed by Raymond Max Snyder in 24-4009, 24-4010, 24-4011, 24-4013 for permission to file electronically. Served on 02/05/2024. Manner of Service: email. [24-4009, 24-4010, 24-4011, 24-4013] [Entered: 02/05/2024 12:31 PM] |
| [11064738] Order filed by Clerk of the Court partially consolidating these four appeals. The briefing schedules previously set are vacated. Appellant shall file one consolidated opening brief by 03/18/2024. Appellant's motion for permission to file electronically is granted. See order for additional information. Served on 02/05/2024. [24-4009, 24-4010, 24-4011, 24-4013] [Entered: 02/05/2024 02:11 PM] |
| This entry has been removed from the docket. Deficient service and certificate. Counsel advised to correct and resubmit. [ART] [11064257] Entry of appearance submitted by Matthew R. Howell for Appellee Lauara Ann Lisk for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: No. Served on 02/02/2024. Manner of Service: email. [24-4009] MRH [Entered: 02/02/2024 11:04 AM] |
| [11064324] Entry of appearance submitted by Matthew R. Howell for Appellee Lauara Ann Lisk for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: No. Served on 02/02/2024. Manner of Service: US mail, email. [24-4009]--[Edited 02/02/2024 by ART to remove pdf as pleading was filed on 02/02/2024] MRH [Entered: 02/02/2024 02:27 PM] |
| [11064383] Entry of appearance filed by Mr. Matthew R. Howell for Lauara Ann Lisk. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 02/02/2024. Manner of Service: US mail, email [24-4009] [Entered: 02/02/2024 04:10 PM] |
| [11063495] Entry of appearance filed by Ms. Peggy E. Stone for Alex Goble. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 01/30/2024, 01/31/2024. Manner of Service: email, US mail [24-4009] [Entered: 01/31/2024 09:45 AM] |
| [11063256] Entry of appearance submitted by Peggy E. Stone for Appellee Alex Goble in 24-4009 for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: No. Served on 01/30/2024. Manner of Service: US mail, email. [24-4009]--[Edited 01/31/2024 by ART to remove document from 24-4010 and 24-4011]--[Edited 01/31/2024 by ART to remove pdf as pleading was filed on 01/31/2024] PES [Entered: 01/30/2024 01:41 PM] |
| [11063289] Record on appeal filed. No. of Volumes: 8, Comments: Volumes I - VIII - Pleadings.--[Edited 02/01/2024 by MLB - USB drives (part of volume 6) was received on 02/01/2024 HARDCOPY ONLY] [24-4009] [Entered: 01/30/2024 02:09 PM] |
| [11062560] Jurisdictional review complete. Appellant's brief due on 03/11/2024 for Raymond Max Snyder. Record on appeal 10th circuit due 02/20/2024 [24-4009] [Entered: 01/29/2024 07:26 AM] |
| [11062185] Civil case docketed. Preliminary record filed. DATE RECEIVED: 01/25/2024 Notice of appearance due on 02/08/2024 for American Family Insurance, Brandt Deaton, Alex Goble, Stewart B. Harman, Casey Jewkes, Lauara Ann Lisk, Shawn B. Meador and Woodburn & Wedge. Notice of appearance due on 02/26/2024 for Raymond Max Snyder. Disclosure statement due on 02/08/2024 for American Family Insurance. [24-4009]--[Edited 01/26/2024 by DJD to attach corrected preliminary record] [Entered: 01/25/2024 03:34 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
