United States v. Withrow
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
BENNIE FRANK WITHROW, IV, AKA Lazy Wood |
24-5040 |
April 8, 2024 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
[11080214] Criminal case docketed. Preliminary record filed. DATE RECEIVED: 04/08/2024. Docketing statement, designation of record, transcript order form, notice of appearance and appointment motion due 04/22/2024 for Bennie Frank Withrow IV. Notice of appearance and disclosure statement due on 04/22/2024 for United States of America. [24-5040] [Entered: 04/08/2024 09:14 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: United States v. Withrow | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
Represented By: | Dennis A. Fries |
Represented By: | David Nasar |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: BENNIE FRANK WITHROW, IV, AKA Lazy Wood | |
Represented By: | Debbie Jang |
Represented By: | Jon M. Sands |
Represented By: | Jeffrey Allen Williams |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.