In re: Patterson
In re: BRIAN W. PATTERSON |
24-5063 |
May 20, 2024 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
[11091798] Entry of appearance filed by Tessa L. Henry for Carrie Bridges. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 05/21/2024. Manner of Service: US mail. [24-5063] [Entered: 05/21/2024 09:44 AM] |
[11091774] Entry of appearance submitted by Tessa L. Henry for Respondent Carrie Bridges for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: No. Served on 05/21/2024. Manner of Service: US mail. [24-5063] --[Edited 05/21/2024 by AT to remove PDF as pleading was filed on 5/21/2024.] TLH [Entered: 05/21/2024 08:59 AM] |
[11091583] Case docketed. Petition for Prohibition filed. c/s: n. Notice of appearance, certificate of service and fee or ifp forms due for 10th Circuit by 06/20/2024 for Brian W. Patterson. Notice of appearance due on 06/03/2024 for Carrie Bridges. DATE RECEIVED: 05/20/2024 [24-5063]--[Edited 05/21/2024 by DJD to amend letter to include certificate of service due] [Entered: 05/20/2024 03:11 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: In re: Patterson | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: In re: BRIAN W. PATTERSON | |
Represented By: | Brian W. Patterson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.