Jordan v. Harpe
| RAY ROGER JORDAN |
| SCOTT CROW, Director and STEVEN HARPE, Director |
| 24-6090 |
| May 10, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| [11092077] Entry of appearance filed by Ray Roger Jordan. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 05/16/2024. Manner of Service: US Mail [24-6090] [Entered: 05/22/2024 07:08 AM] |
| [11092080] Docketing statement filed by Ray Roger Jordan. Served on 05/16/2024. Manner of Service: US mail. [24-6090] [Entered: 05/22/2024 07:13 AM] |
| [11090265] Entry of appearance submitted by Tessa L. Henry for Appellee Steven Harpe for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: No. Served on 05/15/2024. Manner of Service: US mail. [24-6090]--[Edited 05/15/2024 by DJD. Removed PDF as pleading filed 5/15/24] TLH [Entered: 05/15/2024 08:45 AM] |
| [11090297] Entry of appearance filed by Tessa L. Henry for Steven Harpe. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 05/15/2024. Manner of Service: US mail [24-6090] [Entered: 05/15/2024 09:43 AM] |
| [11089750] Order filed by Clerk of the Court abating case. Reason for abatement: DCt Motion. The clerk of the district court is directed to supplement the preliminary record when a dispositive order is entered. Served on 05/13/2024. [24-6090] [Entered: 05/13/2024 03:55 PM] |
| [11089263] Prisoner case docketed. DATE RECEIVED: 05/10/2024. Fee or ifp forms and notice of appearance due 06/10/2024 for Ray Roger Jordan. Notice of appearance due on 05/24/2024 for Scott Crow. [24-6090] [Entered: 05/10/2024 01:03 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
