Smith v. Sheridan County Sheriff
FRANKLIN C. SMITH |
SHERIDAN COUNTY SHERIFF, a/k/a Levi Dominguez |
24-8020 |
March 21, 2024 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
[11087644] Appellant brief and application for certificate of appealability filed by Franklin C. Smith. Original and 4 copies. Served on 04/28/2024 by US Mail. [24-8020] [Entered: 05/06/2024 12:27 PM] |
[11087648] Appellant's motion filed by Franklin C. Smith for reconsideration pursuant to PLRA. Served on 04/28/2024. Manner of Service: US mail. [24-8020] [Entered: 05/06/2024 12:32 PM] |
[11087651] Appellant's motion filed by Franklin C. Smith for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Served on 04/14/2024. Manner of Service: US mail. [24-8020] [Entered: 05/06/2024 12:35 PM] |
[11087673] Order filed by Clerk of the Court denying Appellant's motion for reconsideration pursuant to the Prison Litigation Reform Act filed by Appellant Franklin C. Smith. See order for details. Served on 05/06/2024. [24-8020] [Entered: 05/06/2024 12:57 PM] |
[11083948] Entry of appearance filed by Franklin C. Smith. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. [24-8020] [Entered: 04/22/2024 03:22 PM] |
[11080415] Appellant's motion filed by Franklin C. Smith for writ of mandamus. Served on 03/31/2024. Manner of Service: US mail. [24-8020] [Entered: 04/08/2024 02:35 PM] |
[11080462] Order filed by Clerk of the Court. This matter is before the court on receipt of appellant's submission captioned as "Writ of Mandamus." Upon consideration, the court denies any request for relief appellant includes in his submission without prejudice to renewal. To proceed with this appeal, appellant must-on or before May 6, 2023-either pay the filing fee to the district court, or file an application with this court for leave to proceed on appeal without prepayment of the appellate fees. He must file a combined opening brief and COA on or before May 6, 2023. See order for details. Served on 04/08/2024. [24-8020] [Entered: 04/08/2024 03:32 PM] |
[11077402] Record on appeal filed. No. of Volumes: 1, Comments: Vol 1 pleadings. [24-8020] [Entered: 03/26/2024 04:26 PM] |
[11076647] Jurisdictional review complete. Fee or ifp forms due by 05/06/2024 for Franklin C. Smith. Appellants brief and Certificate of Appealability due 05/06/2024 for Franklin C. Smith. Notice of appearance due on 05/06/2024 for Franklin C. Smith. Record on appeal 10th circuit due 04/15/2024 [24-8020] [Entered: 03/25/2024 08:33 AM] |
[11075982] Prisoner case docketed. DATE RECEIVED: 03/19/2024. Notice of appearance due on 04/04/2024 for Franklin C. Smith. [24-8020] [Entered: 03/21/2024 10:15 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Smith v. Sheridan County Sheriff | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: FRANKLIN C. SMITH | |
Represented By: | Franklin C. Smith |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: SHERIDAN COUNTY SHERIFF, a/k/a Levi Dominguez | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.