In re: Gladstone
| STEPHEN THEODORE GLADSTONE |
| SUMMIT COUNTY and TODD DAVIS |
| 25-1127 |
| March 31, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 30, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 [11178206] Supplemental Judicial Notice in Support of Motion to Vacate received from Stephen Theodore Gladstone but not filed per 10th Cir. R. 40.4. Served on 04/24/2025. Manner of Service: US mail. [25-1127] [Entered: 04/30/2025 02:58 PM] |
| Filing 14 [11178089] Petitioner's motion to vacate and supplemental motion received from Stephen Theodore Gladstone but not filed. Not filed per 10th Cir. R. 40.4. Response from Court attached. Served on 04/30/2025. Manner of Service: US mail. [25-1127] [Entered: 04/30/2025 11:30 AM] |
| Filing 13 [11176442] Motion for judical notice in support for rehearing received from Stephen Theodore Gladstone but not filed. Not filed per 10th Cir. R. 40.4. [25-1127] [Entered: 04/23/2025 02:09 PM] |
| Filing 12 [11176139] Motion to reinstate petition for rehearing received from Stephen Theodore Gladstone but not filed. Not filed per 10th Cir. R. 40.4. Original. (Response letter sent.) [25-1127] --[Edited 04/23/2025 by SDS to modify text] [Entered: 04/22/2025 03:03 PM] |
Filing 11
[11174374] Order filed by Judges McHugh, Eid and Federico denying petition for rehearing filed by Petitioner Stephen Theodore Gladstone. [25-1127] [Entered: 04/15/2025 10:46 AM]
|
| Filing 10 [11173946] Petition for rehearing filed by Stephen Theodore Gladstone. Attachments also included. One cd of Exhibit H also received. [25-1127] [Entered: 04/14/2025 12:06 PM] |
| Filing 9 [11172597] Supplemental notice in support of writ of mandamus and evidence of systemic obstruction received from Stephen Theodore Gladstone but not filed. Response from Court attached. Served on 04/08/2025. Manner of Service: US mail.--[Edited 04/10/2025 by JJH to attach the response from the court to entry] [25-1127] [Entered: 04/08/2025 11:58 AM] |
Filing 8
[8] Denied; Terminated on the merits after submissions without oral hearing; Written, unsigned, unpublished; Final order filed by Judges McHugh, Eid and Federico. [25-1127] [Entered: 04/07/2025 12:05 PM]
|
| Filing 7 [11171829] Notice of supplemental evidence in support of mandamus and emergency injunction filed by Stephen Theodore Gladstone. Served on 4/4/25. Manner of Service: US mail or email. [25-1127] [Entered: 04/04/2025 02:15 PM] |
| Filing 5 [11171813] Entry of appearance filed by Stephen Theodore Gladstone. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: y, more than 50 parties. [25-1127] [Entered: 04/04/2025 01:27 PM] |
| Filing 4 [11170268] Emergency Judicial notice and request for protective oversight under 28 U.S.C 1651(a) filed by Stephen Theodore Gladstone. Original and. Served on 03/31/2025. Manner of Service: email. [25-1127] [Entered: 03/31/2025 04:15 PM] |
| Filing 3 [11170267] Appellant's motion filed by Stephen Theodore Gladstone to submit Exhibit A Index of 139 court filings and order (Disc A). Served on 03/31/2025. Manner of Service: email. [25-1127] [Entered: 03/31/2025 04:13 PM] |
| Filing 2 [11170265] Appellant's motion filed by Stephen Theodore Gladstone for injunction pending appeal. Served on 03/31/2025. Manner of Service: email. [25-1127] [Entered: 03/31/2025 04:11 PM] |
| Filing 1 [11170260] Case docketed. Petition for Writ of Mandamus filed. c/s: y. Fee paid. Check #156; Receipt # 10633; Amount $600.00 Notice of appearance due on 04/30/2025 for Todd Davis and Stephen Theodore Gladstone. DATE RECEIVED: 03/31/2025 [25-1127] [Entered: 03/31/2025 04:03 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.