Bivings v. Paprzycki, et al
| KAYLA S. BIVINGS |
| MAGISTRATE ANDREA PAPRZYCKI, JUDGE MARIKA FRADY, JUDGE HILARY GURNEY, SCOTT SOSEBEE, JESSICA E. YATES, Esq. and OFFICE OF ATTORNEY REGULATION COUNSEL, (OARC) |
| 25-1171 |
| April 29, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 27, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 [11184627] Order filed by Clerk of the Court - This matter is before the court on Appellants Motion to Clarify Opening Brief for Factual Accuracy. Ms. Bivings motion to clarify is construed as an errata to Appellants brief. So construed, the errata is accepted. Served on 05/27/2025. [25-1171] [Entered: 05/27/2025 03:00 PM] |
| Filing 14 [11184626] Construed Errata to Appellants brief per 5/27/25 order (titled as "Appellants Motion to Clarify Brief for Factual Accuracy") filed by Kayla S. Bivings. Served on 05/27/2025. Manner of Service: hand delivery.--[Edited 05/27/2025 by JJH to correct docket title text] [25-1171] [Entered: 05/27/2025 02:58 PM] |
| Filing 13 [11183837] Appellant's brief filed by Kayla S. Bivings. Original and 3 copies. Required 10th Cir. R. 28.2 Attachments Included? y. [25-1171] [Entered: 05/22/2025 01:53 PM] |
| Filing 12 [11181090] Order filed by Clerk of the Court denying without prejudice Appellant's motion for exemption from PACER fees filed by Appellant Kayla S. Bivings. See order. Served on 05/12/2025. [25-1171] [Entered: 05/12/2025 04:10 PM] |
| Filing 11 [11180721] Appellant's motion filed by Kayla S. Bivings for exemption from pacer fees. [25-1171] [Entered: 05/12/2025 07:43 AM] |
| Filing 10 [11180720] Appellant's motion filed by Kayla S. Bivings for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. [25-1171] [Entered: 05/12/2025 07:38 AM] |
| Filing 9 [11178782] Order filed by Clerk of the Court referring Appellant's Motion to Certify Constitutional Questions to the Supreme Court [ # 8 ] to the panel of judges that will later be assigned to consider this case on the merits (no ruling will issue at this time). Served on 05/02/2025. Text only entry - no attachment. [25-1171]--[Edited 05/05/2025 by JM to reflect title of motion.] [Entered: 05/02/2025 02:12 PM] |
| Filing 8 [11178780] Appellant's Motion filed by Kayla S. Bivings to Certify Constitutional Questions to the Supreme Court. [25-1171]--[Edited 05/05/2025 by JM edited to reflect title of motion and to attach exs. 1and 2 ] [Entered: 05/02/2025 02:10 PM] |
| Filing 7 [11178772] IFP form for district court (not on 10th circuit form) received from Kayla S. Bivings but not filed. [25-1171] [Entered: 05/02/2025 01:59 PM] |
| Filing 6 [11178770] Entry of appearance filed by Kayla S. Bivings. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. [25-1171] [Entered: 05/02/2025 01:56 PM] |
| Filing 5 [11178768] Consent to electronic service filed by filed by Kayla S. Bivings. [25-1171] [Entered: 05/02/2025 01:53 PM] |
| Filing 4 [11178358] Record on appeal filed. No. of Volumes: 1, Comments: Volume 1-pleadings. [25-1171] [Entered: 05/01/2025 10:14 AM] |
| Filing 3 [11178327] Jurisdictional review complete. Fee or ifp forms, notice of appearance, and opening brief due by 06/10/2025 for Kayla S. Bivings. Record on appeal 10th circuit due 05/22/2025 [25-1171] [Entered: 05/01/2025 09:31 AM] |
| Filing 2 [11178322] District court order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. [25-1171] [Entered: 05/01/2025 09:28 AM] |
| Filing 1 [11177634] Civil case docketed. Preliminary record filed. DATE RECEIVED: 04/29/2025. Notice of appearance due on 05/29/2025 for Kayla S. Bivings. [25-1171] [Entered: 04/29/2025 09:51 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
