Stetzel v. Stancil, et al
| PHILIP E. STETZEL |
| MOSES ANDRE STANCIL, SIOBHAN BURTLOW, HANNAH FELDHACKER, MICHAEL JONES, JORDAN HARTLEY, DAVID BERGMAN, ALLISON TALLEY, JAMES BAILEY, AMANDA RETTING and SHANNON FOLZ |
| 25-1223 |
| June 3, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 [11193705] Jurisdictional Defect; Procedural termination after other judicial action; Written, unsigned, unpublished; Judges Hartz, Matheson and Eid. [25-1223] [Entered: 07/01/2025 01:04 PM] |
| Filing 4 [11192439] Appellant's memorandum brief filed by Mr. Philip E. Stetzel. Original. [25-1223] [Entered: 06/26/2025 10:49 AM] |
| Filing 3 [11187359] District court order - Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to Proceed on Appeal Without Costs or Fees Pursuant to Pre-approval of 28 U.S.C. 1915 in Lower Court(s) (ECF No. 22) is denied as moot and without prejudice to being refiled in the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals. [25-1223] [Entered: 06/05/2025 01:51 PM] |
| Filing 2 [11186593] Order filed by Clerk of the Court. This matter is before the court on its own initiative following the opening of this appeal and review of the district court docket. The court is considering summary disposition of this appeal. Appellant's memorandum brief due 06/24/2025 for Philip E. Stetzel. Served on 06/03/2025. [25-1223] See order for additional information. [Entered: 06/03/2025 03:46 PM] |
| Filing 1 [11186485] Prisoner case docketed. DATE RECEIVED: 06/03/2025. Notice of appearance due on 07/03/2025 for Philip E. Stetzel. [25-1223] [Entered: 06/03/2025 01:54 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
