In re: Dees, et al
| JENNIFER L. DEES |
| PHIL WEISER, KEVIN TRASKOS, JARED POLIS, WILLIAM HOOD, ANDREW MACCALLIN, ANGELA BOYKINS, BRIAN BOATRIGHT, MELISSA HART, MONICA MARQUEZ, RICHARD GABRIEL, CARLOS SAMOUR, JR., MARIA BERKENKOTTER and JOSEPH STOCKWELL, John and Jane Does |
| 25-1274 |
| July 15, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 1, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
[6] Denied; Procedural termination after submissions without oral argument; Written, unsigned, unpublished; Final order filed denying petition for writ of mandamus by Judges Bacharach, Moritz and Eid. [25-1274] [Entered: 08/01/2025 09:14 AM]
|
|
Filing 5
[11202034] Order filed by Judges Bacharach, Moritz and Eid - granting petitioner's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. As contained in the court's final order. Text only entry - no attachment. [25-1274] [Entered: 08/01/2025 08:21 AM]
|
| Filing 4 [11201927] Consent to electronic service filed by filed by Jennifer L. Dees. [25-1274] [Entered: 07/31/2025 02:09 PM] |
| Filing 3 [11201923] Entry of appearance filed by Jennifer L. Dees. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. [25-1274] [Entered: 07/31/2025 02:05 PM] |
| Filing 2 [11197235] Appellant's motion filed by Jennifer L. Dees for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Served on 07/15/2025. Manner of Service: US mail. [25-1274] [Entered: 07/15/2025 02:17 PM] |
| Filing 1 [11197230] Case docketed. Petition mandamus filed. c/s: n. DATE RECEIVED: 07/15/2025 [25-1274] [Entered: 07/15/2025 02:11 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
