In re: King
| IKE L. KING |
| MONICA MARQUEZ, BRIAN BOATRIGHT, WILLIAM W. HOOD, III, RICHARD L. GABRIEL, MELISSA HART, CARLOS A. SAMOUR, MARIA E. BERKENKOTTER, CHERYL STEVENS, NORMA ANGELICA SIERRA, DAHLIA D. OLSHER TANNEN and KELLY O. CLARK |
| 25-1352 |
| September 10, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 21, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 [11224813] Returned mail filed. Addressed To: Ike L. King. Reason Returned: No such street. Document Returned: 10/6/25 order. Action Taken: None. [25-1352] [Entered: 10/21/2025 05:11 PM] |
Filing 5
[5] Dismissed as frivolous; Procedural termination after other judicial action; Written, unsigned, unpublished; Final order filed dismissing as frivolous writ of mandamus by Judges Holmes, Moritz and Carson. [25-1352] [Entered: 10/06/2025 03:30 PM]
|
Filing 4
[11220518] Order filed by Judges Holmes, Moritz and Carson - denying motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Petitioner Mr. Ike L. King. As contained in the Court's final order. Text only entry - no attachment. [25-1352] [Entered: 10/06/2025 02:18 PM]
|
| Filing 3 [11216743] Entry of appearance filed by Mr. Ike L. King. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 09/23/2025. Manner of Service: US mail [25-1352] [Entered: 09/23/2025 01:24 PM] |
| Filing 2 [11216740] Appellant's motion filed by Mr. Ike L. King for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Served on 09/23/2025. Manner of Service: US mail. [25-1352] [Entered: 09/23/2025 01:23 PM] |
| Filing 1 [11213269] Case docketed. Petition mandamus filed. c/s: n Fee or IFP forms and notice of appearance due 10/10/2025 for Ike L. King. DATE RECEIVED: 09/10/2025 [25-1352] [Entered: 09/10/2025 01:04 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.