Shaik v. Murray County Commissioners, et al
| ZAK SHAIK |
| MURRAY COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, MURRAY COUNTY ASSESSOR'S OFFICE, MURRAY COUNTY TREASURER and JAMES ENGLISH, in his official capacity as Assistant District Attorney |
| 25-7008 |
| January 28, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 [11162218] Record on appeal filed. No. of Volumes: 2. Volume I - Pleadings and Volume II - Sealed Pleading. [25-7008] [Entered: 02/28/2025 10:41 AM] |
| Filing 12 [11161896] Minute order filed - Appellees brief now due 03/31/2025 for Baldwin Insurance Group Holdings, LLC, Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London, Millennial Specialty Insurance, Association of County Commissioners of Oklahoma, Kara Christy, Wallace Coppedge, James English, Ben Flowers, Don Helpingstine, Darrell Hudson, Rebecca Johnson, Kent McKinley, Mark Melton, Darin Rogers and Colt Williams. See the court's 01/28/2025 order and the court's 02/27/2025 letter for more information. (Text Only - No Attachment) [25-7004, 25-7005, 25-7006, 25-7007, 25-7008] [Entered: 02/27/2025 10:58 AM] |
| Filing 11 [11161892] Appellant's motion filed by Zak Shaik for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Served on 02/27/2025. Manner of Service: email. [25-7004, 25-7005, 25-7006, 25-7007, 25-7008] [Entered: 02/27/2025 10:52 AM] |
| Filing 10 [11161891] Appellant brief filed by Zak Shaik in 25-7004, 25-7005, 25-7007, 25-7006, 25-7008. Served on 02/27/2025 by email. Required 10th Cir. R. 28.2 Attachments Included? n. [25-7004, 25-7005, 25-7006, 25-7007, 25-7008] [Entered: 02/27/2025 10:51 AM] |
| Filing 9 [11161882] Jurisdictional review complete. Records on appeal in the 10th circuit due 03/20/2025 [25-7004, 25-7005, 25-7006, 25-7007, 25-7008] [Entered: 02/27/2025 10:39 AM] |
| Filing 8 [11161868] Order filed by Clerk of the Court lifting the abatement in appeal nos. 25-7004, 25-7005, 25-7006, and 25-7007. See order for additional information. Served on 02/27/2025. [25-7004, 25-7005, 25-7006, 25-7007, 25-7008] [Entered: 02/27/2025 10:07 AM] |
| Filing 7 [11154329] Order filed by Clerk of the Court partially consolidating the five appeals for procedural purposes of briefing and submission to a panel of judges for decision. Each appeal will proceed on its own record on appeal. See order for details. Served on 01/28/2025. [25-7004, 25-7008, 25-7005, 25-7006, 25-7007] [Entered: 01/28/2025 03:24 PM] |
| Filing 6 [11154262] Opening brief received from Zak Shaik but not filed. Served on 01/28/2025. Manner of Service: email. [25-7008] [Entered: 01/28/2025 01:47 PM] |
| Filing 5 [11154259] Motion for leave to proceed on appeal without prepayment of costs or fees received from Zak Shaik but not filed. Served on 01/28/2025. Manner of Service: email. [25-7008] [Entered: 01/28/2025 01:46 PM] |
| Filing 4 [11154257] Rule 26 Disclosure Statement filed by Zak Shaik. More than 50 parties disclosed: no. Served on 01/28/2025. Manner of Service: email. [25-7008] [Entered: 01/28/2025 01:44 PM] |
| Filing 3 [11154255] Consent to electronic service filed by filed by Zak Shaik. Served on 01/28/2025. Manner of Service: email. [25-7008] [Entered: 01/28/2025 01:43 PM] |
| Filing 2 [11154254] Entry of appearance filed by Zak Shaik. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 01/28/2025. Manner of Service: email. [25-7008] [Entered: 01/28/2025 01:42 PM] |
| Filing 1 [11154249] Civil case docketed. Preliminary record filed. DATE RECEIVED: 01/28/2025 Fee or IFP forms due in district court 02/27/2025 for Zak Shaik. [25-7008] [Entered: 01/28/2025 01:37 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
