Buckner v. City of Sallisaw, Oklahoma, et al
| WILLIAM SEAN BUCKNER |
| CITY OF SALLISAW, OKLAHOMA, LT. HOUSTON MURRAY, individually and CHIEF OF POLICE TERRY FRANKLIN, individually |
| 25-7034 |
| May 2, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 14, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 [11205606] Mandate issued. [25-7034] [Entered: 08/14/2025 01:13 PM] |
| Filing 16 [11205604] Frap 42; Procedural termination without judicial action by Clerk of Court. [25-7034] [Entered: 08/14/2025 01:12 PM] |
| Filing 15 [11205603] Order filed by Clerk of the Court granting attorney motion to dismiss case. Served on 08/14/2025. Text only entry - no attachment. [25-7034] [Entered: 08/14/2025 01:08 PM] |
| Filing 14 [11205561] Motion filed by Appellant William Sean Buckner to dismiss case. Served on: 08/14/2025. Manner of service: email. This pleading complies with all required privacy and virus certifications: Yes. [25-7034] RCW [Entered: 08/14/2025 11:45 AM] |
| Filing 13 [11200325] Order filed by Clerk of the Court. This matter is before the court on the entry of appearance of new retained counsel for the appellant. Tolling of briefing in this appeal is lifted. Transcript order form due 08/08/2025 for William Sean Buckner. Please see Order for additional information. Served on 07/25/2025. [25-7034] [Entered: 07/25/2025 03:18 PM] |
| Filing 12 [11200289] Entry of appearance filed by R. Charles Wilkin for William Sean Buckner. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 07/25/2025. Manner of Service: email [25-7034] [Entered: 07/25/2025 01:27 PM] |
| Filing 11 [11200274] Entry of appearance submitted by R. Charles Wilkin for Appellant William Sean Buckner for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: No. Served on 07/25/2025. Manner of Service: email. [25-7034]--[Edited 07/25/2025 by DJD. Removed PDF as pleading filed 7/25/25] RCW [Entered: 07/25/2025 01:02 PM] |
| Filing 10 [11196073] Deficiency notice issued. Type of deficiency: retained new counsel or pro se entry of appearance due but not filed. Retained new counsel's entry appearance now due by 07/24/2025. In the alternative, if Mr. Buckner chooses to proceed pro se, entry of appearance now due by 07/24/2025. [25-7034] [Entered: 07/10/2025 01:42 PM] |
Filing 9
[11189361] Order filed by Judges Matheson and Bacharach. This matter is before us once again to address the status of the appellants retained counsel to practice in this court. To date, Mr. Conrady has not responded to the court. Accordingly, he is removed as counsel of record for the appellant in this appeal and referred to the courts attorney disciplinary panel for further proceedings. Retained new counsel must enter an appearance in this appeal by 06/27/2025. In the alternative, if Mr. Buckner chooses to proceed pro se, he must file a pro se entry of appearance by 06/27/2025. Please see Order for additional information. Served on 06/13/2025. [25-7034]--[Edited 06/13/2025 by ART to correct text] [Entered: 06/13/2025 11:52 AM]
|
| Filing 8 [11186553] Order filed by Clerk of the Court. On or before 06/09/2025, Mr. Conrady shall file a motion to withdraw in accordance with Tenth Circuit Rule 46. Failure to timely comply with this order may result in Mr. Conradys involuntary removal from this appeal and referral to the courts attorney disciplinary panel for additional disciplinary proceedings. Please see Order for additional information. Served on 06/03/2025. [25-7034] [Entered: 06/03/2025 03:24 PM] |
| Filing 7 [11182154] Order filed by Clerk of the Court - The appellants retained counsel, James A. Conrady, was suspended from practice in this court and has not been reinstated. Mr. Conrady must file a motion to withdraw on or before 05/29/2025. All pending deadlines are vacated and regular proceedings are tolled pending further order of this court. See order for additional information. Served on 05/15/2025. [25-7034] [Entered: 05/15/2025 01:52 PM] |
| Filing 6 [11182045] Entry of appearance filed by Mr. James A. Conrady for William Sean Buckner. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 05/15/2025. Manner of Service: email. [25-7034] [Entered: 05/15/2025 11:06 AM] |
| Filing 5 [11182027] Entry of appearance submitted by James A. Conrady for Appellant William Sean Buckner for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: No. Served on 05/14/2025. Manner of Service: email. [25-7034] --[Edited 05/15/2025 by AT to remove PDF as pleading was filed on 5/15/2025.] JAC [Entered: 05/15/2025 10:37 AM] |
| Filing 4 [11182024] Docketing statement filed by William Sean Buckner. Served on 05/14/2025. Manner of Service: email. [25-7034] --[Edited 05/15/2025 by DJD to unseal per call from atty] JAC [Entered: 05/15/2025 10:32 AM] |
| Filing 3 [11179206] Entry of appearance filed by Mr. Keith A. Wilkes for Mr. Terry Franklin, City of Sallisaw, Oklahoma and Houston Murray. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: y. Served on 05/05/2025. Manner of Service: email. [25-7034] [Entered: 05/05/2025 03:27 PM] |
| Filing 2 [11179173] Entry of appearance submitted by Keith A. Wilkes for Appellees City of Sallisaw, Oklahoma, Mr. Terry Franklin and Houston Murray for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: Yes. Served on 04/30/2025. Manner of Service: email. [25-7034] --[Edited 05/05/2025 by AT to remove PDF as pleading was filed on 5/5/2025.] KAW [Entered: 05/05/2025 02:45 PM] |
| Filing 1 [11178694] Civil case docketed. Preliminary record filed. DATE RECEIVED: 05/01/2025. Notice of appearance, Docketing statement and Transcript order form due 05/16/2025 for William Sean Buckner. Notice of appearance due on 05/16/2025 for City of Sallisaw, Oklahoma, Terry Franklin and Houston Murray [25-7034] [Entered: 05/02/2025 11:32 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
