In re: Nicholson
| BRYAN DOUGLAS NICHOLSON |
| CASEY HAMILTON |
| 25-7098 |
| December 12, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 12, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
[9] Denied as moot. Terminated after submissions without oral hearing. Written, unsigned, unpublished. Final order filed by Judges Matheson, Kelly and Moritz denying the petition for writ of mandamus as moot. [25-7098] [Entered: 02/12/2026 12:31 PM]
|
|
Filing 8
[11255243] District court's opinion and order (which includes response to 01/23/2026 order) & judgment filed by Judge Heil. Served on 02/11/2026. Manner of Service: email. [25-7098] [Entered: 02/11/2026 09:02 AM]
|
|
Filing 7
[11250199] Order filed by Judges Matheson, Kelly and Moritz - We invite the district court to respond to Mr. Nicholson's mandamus petition within 30 days - 02/23/2026 - from the date of this orderI. Served on 01/23/2026. [25-7098] [Entered: 01/23/2026 11:47 AM]
|
| Filing 6 [11244737] Entry of appearance filed by Mr. James Lee Hankins for Bryan Douglas Nicholson. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: y (The parties listed are counsel of record and district court judge of record). Served on 01/05/2026. Manner of Service: email. [25-7098] [Entered: 01/06/2026 10:33 AM] |
| Filing 5 [11244581] Entry of appearance submitted by James L. Hankins for Petitioner Bryan Douglas Nicholson for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: Yes. Served on 01/05/2026. Manner of Service: email. [25-7098] --[Edited 01/06/2026 by AT to remove PDF as pleading was filed on 1/6/2026.] JLH [Entered: 01/05/2026 05:29 PM] |
| Filing 4 [11243460] Deficiency notice issued. Type of deficiency: notice of appearance overdue but not filed. Notice of appearance now due by 01/05/2026 for Bryan Douglas Nicholson [25-7098] [Entered: 12/31/2025 10:06 AM] |
| Filing 3 [11239583] Entry of appearance filed by Ms. Keeley L. Miller for Casey Hamilton. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 12/15/2025. Manner of Service: email. [25-7098] [Entered: 12/15/2025 02:53 PM] |
| Filing 2 [11239564] Entry of appearance submitted by Keeley L. Miller for Respondent Casey Hamilton for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: No. Served on 12/15/2025. Manner of Service: email. [25-7098] --[Edited 12/15/2025 by AT to remove PDF as pleading was filed on 12/15/2025.] KLM [Entered: 12/15/2025 02:41 PM] |
| Filing 1 [11239195] Case docketed. Petition Mandamus filed. c/s: y. Fee paid. Receipt # A10-54671-788. Amount $600.00. Notice of appearance due on 12/26/2025 for Casey Hamilton and Bryan Douglas Nicholson. DATE RECEIVED: 12/12/2025. [25-7098] [Entered: 12/12/2025 04:13 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: In re: Nicholson | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: BRYAN DOUGLAS NICHOLSON | |
| Represented By: | James Lee Hankins |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: CASEY HAMILTON | |
| Represented By: | Keeley L. Miller |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
