Crump v. Central Office, et al
| NORVELL WEBSTER CRUMP |
| CENTRAL OFFICE, NORTH CENTRAL REGIONAL OFFICE, ADMINISTRATIVE MAXIMUM, WARDEN, UNITED STATES PROBATION OFFICES, Supervised Release, ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY COORDINATOR, BUREAU OF PRISONS AGENCIES and FLORENCE ADX |
| 26-1034 |
| February 4, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 [11268449] Miscellaneous documents received from Norvell Webster Crump but not filed. Original. (Response letter sent.) [26-1034] [Entered: 03/30/2026 01:06 PM] |
| Filing 5 [11264902] Miscellaneous letter received from Norvell Webster Crump but not filed. [26-1034] [Entered: 03/18/2026 11:55 AM] |
| Filing 4 [11260993] Mandate issued. [26-1034] [Entered: 03/05/2026 09:19 AM] |
| Filing 3 [11260991] Default; Procedural termination without judicial action; Clerk of the Court. [26-1034] [Entered: 03/05/2026 09:17 AM] |
| Filing 2 [11253468] Order filed by Clerk of the Court. This matter is before the court following the opening of this appeal. Accordingly, the appeal appears premature, and the court is considering it for summary disposition. Appellant's memorandum brief due 02/25/2026 for Norvell Webster Crump. Served on 02/04/2026. [26-1034] See attached order. [Entered: 02/04/2026 12:40 PM] |
| Filing 1 [11253338] Prisoner case docketed. DATE RECEIVED: 02/04/2026. Notice of appearance due on 03/06/2026 for Norvell Webster Crump. Fee or ifp forms due 03/06/2026 for Norvell Webster Crump. [26-1034] [Entered: 02/04/2026 10:16 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
