Emrit, et al v. Snoop Doggy Dogg, et al
| RONALD SATISH EMRIT, Former Client of Paul Gardner, Esquire of Gardner Law Group of Baltimore, Maryland as Entertainment Attorney for Outkast, Mya, Mos Def, Tommy Davidson and Salahis, SATISH DAT BEAST, Former Client of Larry Birkhead Attorney Nancy Hass of Hallandale Beach Florida as Family Law Attorney and GO GO SATISH, Former Client of Thomas Hart, Esquire of On The Potomac of Washington, DC and Holand & Knight, LLP and Entertainment Attorney for Gloria Estefan and James Todd Smith also Known as LL Cool J |
| SNOOP DOGGY DOGG, Marijuana Smoker named Calvin Broadus, SNOOP DOGGY DOGG BOWL IN ARIZONA, THE RACIST STATE OF ARIZONA, The Only State Which Did not Approve of the Holiday for the Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King, Junior, NBC, COMCAST, NBC UNIVERSAL, VIVENDI UNIVERSAL, PEACOCK, UNITED STATES OLYMPIC COMMITTEE, USOC, MIKE TIRICO, CRIS COLLINSWORTH, SUNDAY NIGHT FOOTBALL, ROGER GOODELL, NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, KENDRICK LAMAR, JAY-Z, DR. DRE, ICE CUBE, ESTATE OF EAZY E ERIC WRIGHT, Former HIV/AIDS patient, SUPER BOWL HALFTIME SHOW and BAD BUNNY |
| 26-1037 |
| February 9, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Emrit, et al. v. Snoop Doggy Dogg, et al. |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
[11271179] Affirmed; Terminated on the merits after submissions without oral hearing; Written, signed, unpublished; Judges Hartz, Matheson (authoring) and Rossman. Mandate to issue. [26-1037] [Entered: 04/08/2026 09:36 AM]
|
Filing 10
[11271137] Order filed by Judges Hartz, Matheson and Rossman denying appellant's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Appellant Mr. Ronald Satish Emrit. Text only entry - no attachment. (See the case termination entry for the order.) [26-1037] [Entered: 04/08/2026 08:09 AM]
|
Filing 9
[11263484] Entry of appearance (Second one) filed by Mr. Ronald Satish Emrit. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. [26-1037] [Entered: 03/12/2026 03:14 PM]
|
Filing 8
[11263481] Appellant's motion filed by Mr. Ronald Satish Emrit for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. [26-1037] [Entered: 03/12/2026 03:12 PM]
|
Filing 7
[11263475] Appellant's brief filed by Mr. Ronald Satish Emrit. Required 10th Cir. R. 28.2 Attachments Included? n. [26-1037] [Entered: 03/12/2026 03:06 PM]
|
Filing 6
[11261164] Entry of appearance filed by Mr. Ronald Satish Emrit. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. [26-1037] [Entered: 03/05/2026 01:08 PM]
|
Filing 5
[11261161] Consent to electronic service filed by filed by Mr. Ronald Satish Emrit. [26-1037] [Entered: 03/05/2026 01:07 PM]
|
Filing 4
[11261156] Miscellaneous correspondence received from Mr. Ronald Satish Emrit but not filed. [26-1037] [Entered: 03/05/2026 01:05 PM]
|
Filing 3
[11256338] Record on appeal filed. No. of Volumes: 2, Comments: Volume 1 - Pleadings Volume 2 - Pleading.. [26-1037] [Entered: 02/17/2026 08:09 AM]
|
Filing 2
[11256334] Jurisdictional review complete. Fee or ifp forms, notice of appearance, and opening brief due by 03/30/2026 for Ronald Satish Emrit. Record on appeal 10th circuit due 03/10/2026 [26-1037] [Entered: 02/17/2026 08:02 AM]
|
Filing 1
[11254698] Civil case docketed. Preliminary record filed. DATE RECEIVED: 02/09/2026 Notice of appearance due on 03/11/2026 for Ronald Satish Emrit. [26-1037] [Entered: 02/09/2026 04:15 PM]
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.