Strege v. Grand Junction Police Department, et al
| ADAM STREGE |
| GRAND JUNCTION POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY GRAND JUNCTION and POLICE OFFICER NATE LONG, in his individual and official capacity |
| 26-1174 |
| May 7, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Strege v. Grand Junction Police Department, et al. |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 32
[11324175] Mandate issued. [26-1174] [Entered: 10/05/2026 07:50 AM]
|
|
Filing 31
[11316839] Affirmed;Terminated on the merits after submissions without oral hearing;Written, signed, unpublished; Judges Phillips, Kelly (authoring) and Federico. Mandate to issue. [26-1174] [Entered: 09/11/2026 08:58 AM]
|
|
Filing 30
[11316837] Order filed by Judges Phillips, Kelly and Federico, as found in the order and judgment, denying motions to correct clerical mistake and for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Appellant Mr. Adam Strege. [text only entry - see case termination for order and judgment] [26-1174] [Entered: 09/11/2026 08:56 AM]
|
|
Filing 29
[11311331] Minute order filed - the reply brief submitted by appellant is accepted for filing. The parties will be notified via separate docket entry if paper copies are required. (Text Only - No Attachment) [26-1174] [Entered: 08/25/2026 03:34 PM]
|
|
Filing 28
[11311261] Appellant/Petitioner's reply brief filed by Mr. Adam Strege. Served on 08/24/2026. Manner of Service: email. Word/page count: 6550. This pleading complies with all required privacy and virus certifications: Yes. [26-1174] AS [Entered: 08/25/2026 02:03 PM]
|
|
Filing 27
[11310985] Notice of appellant's deficient reply brief received from Mr. Adam Strege. Type of deficiency: reply brief exceeds word limitations. See attached letter for specifics. Appellant's reply brief now due 09/01/2026 by Adam Strege. [26-1174] [Entered: 08/25/2026 07:38 AM]
|
|
Filing 26
This entry has been removed from the docket. Corrected reply brief filed 08/25/2026. [sds] [11310956] Appellant/Petitioner's reply brief filed by Mr. Adam Strege. Served on 08/24/2026. Manner of Service: email. Word/page count: 8000. This pleading complies with all required privacy and virus certifications: Yes. [26-1174] --[Edited 08/25/2026 by SDS to cite as deficient] AS [Entered: 08/24/2026 08:10 PM]
|
|
Filing 25
[11308885] Minute order filed - Appellee's brief is accepted for filing. The parties will be notified via separate docket entry if paper copies are required. Appellant's optional reply brief now due 09/08/2026 for Adam Strege. (Text Only - No Attachment) [26-1174] [Entered: 08/18/2026 08:54 AM]
|
|
Filing 24
[11308760] Appellee/Respondent's brief filed by City Grand Junction, Grand Junction Police Department and Nate Long. Served on: 08/17/2026. Manner of service: email. Oral argument requested? No. Word/page count: 950. This pleading complies with all required privacy and virus certifications: Yes. [26-1174] JK [Entered: 08/17/2026 04:13 PM]
|
|
Filing 23
[11304735] Miscellaneous correspondence received from Appellant Mr. Adam Strege and not filed Served on: 08/03/2026. Manner of service: email. This pleading complies with all required privacy and virus certifications: Yes.--[Edited 08/04/2026 by JJH to correct docket text and to note this filing was received not filed] [26-1174] AS [Entered: 08/03/2026 04:45 PM]
|
|
Filing 22
[11304714] Returned mail filed. Addressed To: appellant. Reason Returned: not deliverable as addressed/unable to forward. Document Returned: 6/5/26 letter, orders and forms. Action Taken: the order granting permission to file electronically was sent via email; the other documents are not moot in terms of service. [26-1174] [Entered: 08/03/2026 04:12 PM]
|
|
Filing 21
[11300308] Second consent to electronic service filed by filed by Mr. Adam Strege. Served on 07/20/2026. Manner of Service: US mail. [26-1174] [Entered: 07/20/2026 01:54 PM]
|
|
Filing 20
[11300227] Returned mail filed. Addressed To: appellant. Reason Returned: no mail receptacle. Document Returned: 6/30/26 order. Action Taken: sent via email, since he has now consented to e-service. [26-1174] [Entered: 07/20/2026 12:09 PM]
|
|
Filing 19
[11300223] Minute order filed - the brief submitted by appellant is accepted for filing. The parties will be notified via separate docket entry if paper copies are required. Appellees' brief now due 08/17/2026 for Grand Junction Police Department, Nate Long and City Grand Junction. (Text Only - No Attachment) [26-1174] [Entered: 07/20/2026 12:06 PM]
|
|
Filing 18
[11299999] Appellant/Petitioner's brief filed by Mr. Adam Strege. Served on 07/18/2026 by email. Oral argument requested? No. Word/page count: 6671. This pleading complies with all required privacy and virus certifications: Yes. [26-1174] AS [Entered: 07/18/2026 03:51 PM]
|
|
Filing 17
[11299995] Consent to electronic service filed by Mr. Adam Strege. Served on 07/18/2026. Manner of Service: email. This pleading complies with all required privacy and virus certifications: Yes. [26-1174] AS [Entered: 07/18/2026 10:29 AM]
|
|
Filing 16
[11294305] Order filed by Clerk of the Court granting Appellant's motion to extend time to file brief. Appellant's brief due on 08/14/2026 for Adam Strege. No further extensions of time will be granted on the clerk's authority. Served on 06/30/2026. [26-1174] [Entered: 06/30/2026 08:54 AM]
|
|
Filing 15
[11294097] Appellant's motion filed by Mr. Adam Strege to extend time to file appellant's brief. Served on 06/29/2026. Manner of Service: email. [26-1174] [Entered: 06/29/2026 02:56 PM]
|
|
Filing 14
[11289665] Returned mail filed. Addressed To: appellant. Reason Returned: no mail receptacle/unable to forward. Document Returned: 5/19/26 order. Action Taken: none. [26-1174] [Entered: 06/11/2026 01:30 PM]
|
|
Filing 13
[11288286] Record on appeal filed. No. of Volumes: 1, Comments: vol 1 pleadings. [26-1174] [Entered: 06/08/2026 08:12 AM]
|
|
Filing 12
[11288138] Jurisdictional review complete. Record on appeal due district court 06/15/2026. Appellant's brief due on 07/15/2026 for Adam Strege. [26-1174]--[Edited 06/05/2026 by KLP to attach corrected letter.] [Entered: 06/05/2026 02:38 PM]
|
|
Filing 11
[11288135] Order filed by Clerk of the Court granting Appellant's motion for permission to file electronically. Served on 06/05/2026. (Written order attached.) [26-1174] [Entered: 06/05/2026 02:34 PM]
|
|
Filing 10
[11288132] Order filed by Clerk of the Court denying appellant's motion forextension of time to file the opening brief without prejudice to renewal as unnecessary because no deadline for his opening brief has been set yet. Served on 06/05/2026. (Written order attached.) [26-1174] [Entered: 06/05/2026 02:30 PM]
|
|
Filing 9
[11287972] Appellant's motion filed by Mr. Adam Strege for permission to file electronically, to extend time to file appellant/petitioner's brief. Served on 06/05/2026. Manner of Service: email. [26-1174] [Entered: 06/05/2026 11:20 AM]
|
|
Filing 8
[11284280] Entry of appearance filed by Mr. James Kadolph and Mr. Eric Michael Ziporin for Grand Junction Police Department, Nate Long and City Grand Junction. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 05/21/2026. Manner of Service: US mail [26-1174] [Entered: 05/21/2026 03:20 PM]
|
|
Filing 7
[11284253] Entry of appearance submitted by Eric Michael Ziporin, James Thomas Kadolph for Appellees City Grand Junction, Grand Junction Police Department and Nate Long for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: No. Served on 05/21/2026. Manner of Service: US mail, email.--[Edited 05/21/2026 by JJH to remove pdf as pleading filed 05/21/2026] [26-1174] JK [Entered: 05/21/2026 02:46 PM]
|
|
Filing 6
[11283507] Order filed by Clerk of the Court - as a one time courtesy as appellant has not sought or been granted leave to file electronically in this appeal, the court will accpet for filing appellant's motion for leave to correct clerical mistake and motion for leave to proceed on appeal without prepayment of costs or fees . The motion for leave to correct clerical mistake under FRCP 60(a) [ # 3 ] is referred to the panel of judges that will later be assigned to consider this case on the merits (no ruling will issue at this time). See order for details. Served on 05/19/2026. [26-1174] [Entered: 05/19/2026 03:15 PM]
|
|
Filing 5
[11283184] Motion filed by Appellant Mr. Adam Strege for leave to proceed in forma pauperis.. Served on: 05/18/2026. Manner of service: email. This pleading complies with all required privacy and virus certifications: Yes. [26-1174] AS [Entered: 05/18/2026 07:51 PM]
|
|
Filing 4
[11283181] Bill of costs received and not filed by Mr. Adam Strege. Served on 05/18/2026. Manner of Service: email. This pleading complies with all required privacy and virus certifications: Yes. [26-1174]--[Edited 05/19/2026 by LG to change from filed to received only] AS [Entered: 05/18/2026 07:27 PM]
|
|
Filing 3
[11282399] Motion filed by Appellant Mr. Adam Strege to correct clerical mistake under FRCP 60(a). Served on: 05/15/2026. Manner of service: email. This pleading complies with all required privacy and virus certifications: Yes. [26-1174] --[Edited 05/19/2026 by SDS to modify text] AS [Entered: 05/15/2026 08:48 AM]
|
|
Filing 2
[11281409] Amended notice of appeal filed. [26-1174] [Entered: 05/12/2026 02:49 PM]
|
|
Filing 1
[11280049] Civil case docketed. Preliminary record filed. DATE RECEIVED: 05/06/2026 Fee or ifp forms due 06/08/2026 for Adam Strege. Notice of appearance due on 05/21/2026 for City Grand Junction, Grand Junction Police Department and Nate Long, and Notice of appearance due on 06/08/2026 for Adam Strege. [26-1174] [Entered: 05/07/2026 10:32 AM]
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
