In re: Hoid
| EDWARD HOID |
| BOULDER COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE |
| 26-1221 |
| June 9, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 9, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 [11288692] Petitioner's motion filed by Edward Hoid for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Served on 06/09/2026. Manner of Service: email. [26-1221] [Entered: 06/09/2026 09:09 AM] |
| Filing 1 [11288683] Case docketed. Petition for writ mandamus filed. c/s: y Notice of appearance due on 06/23/2026 for Boulder County Sheriff's Office, and Notice of appearance due on 07/09/2026 for Edward Hoid. DATE RECEIVED: 06/08/2026. [26-1221] [Entered: 06/09/2026 09:00 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: In re: Hoid | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: EDWARD HOID | |
| Represented By: | Edward Hoid |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: BOULDER COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE | |
| Represented By: | Catherine R. Ruhland |
| Represented By: | Kathryn Elizabeth Haywood |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
