Cuervo v. Sorenson, et al
| PATRICIA CUERVO |
| TODD SORENSON, Captain, Mesa County Sheriffs Office, TRAVIS CHRISTENSEN, Sergeant, Mesa County Sheriffs Office, MARCO MONTEZ, Sergeant, Mesa County Sheriff's Office, TIM ORR, Sergeant, Mesa County Sheriff's Office, ERIC OLSON, Investigator, Mesa County Sheriff's Office, CURTIS CALLOW, Deputy, Mesa County Sheriffs Office, DONALD LOVE, Deputy, Mesa County Sheriff's Office, SETH PARKER, Deputy, Mesa County Sheriff's Office, THOMAS STUCKENSCHNEIDER, Deputy, Mesa County Sheriff's Office, JOSH SANCHEZ, Deputy, Mesa County Sheriff's Office, RYAN REASONER, Deputy, Mesa County Sheriff's Office, GARTH COWLY, Deputy, Mesa County Sheriff's Office, SALMINEO ESPINDOLA, Deputy, Mesa County Sheriff's Office, DERVIN SANDELL, Deputy, Mesa County Sheriff's Office, MIKE MILLER, Investigator, Mesa County Sheriff's Office and JAMIE PENNAY, Sergeant, Mesa County Sheriff's Office |
| 26-1237 |
| June 22, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 22, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 [11291864] Civil case docketed. Preliminary record filed. DATE RECEIVED: 06/22/2026. Docketing statement due 07/06/2026 for Patricia Cuervo. Transcript order form due 07/06/2026 for Patricia Cuervo. Notice of appearance due on 07/06/2026 for Curtis Callow, Travis Christensen, Garth Cowly, Patricia Cuervo, Salmineo Espindola, Donald Love, Mike Miller, Marco Montez, Eric Olson, Tim Orr, Seth Parker, Jamie Pennay, Ryan Reasoner, Josh Sanchez, Dervin Sandell, Todd Sorenson and Thomas Stuckenschneider [26-1237] [Entered: 06/22/2026 11:08 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.