Compa Rodriguez v. Jones
| CARLOS ZADED COMPA RODRIGUEZ |
| E. JONES, Warden |
| 26-1260 |
| June 30, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 [11294646] Jurisdictional review complete. Appellant's brief, notice of appearance and fee or ifp forms due on 08/10/2026 for Carlos Zaded Compa Rodriguez. Record on appeal 10th circuit due 07/21/2026. [26-1260] [Entered: 06/30/2026 04:25 PM] |
| Filing 1 [11294541] Prisoner case docketed. DATE RECEIVED: 06/30/2026. Notice of appearance due on 07/30/2026 for Carlos Zaded Compa Rodriguez. [26-1260] [Entered: 06/30/2026 01:56 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Compa Rodriguez v. Jones | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: CARLOS ZADED COMPA RODRIGUEZ | |
| Represented By: | Carlos Zaded Compa Rodriguez |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: E. JONES, Warden | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.